Failure to Safeguard and Account for Controlled Pain Medications
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect residents from misappropriation of their controlled pain medications and to maintain required controls over these drugs. For nine residents with active orders for narcotic or controlled pain medications (including tramadol, oxycodone, hydrocodone-acetaminophen, and oxycodone-acetaminophen), pharmacy records showed that multiple prescriptions were filled and delivered to the facility, but there were no corresponding declining count sheets or complete delivery documentation. In several instances, delivery receipts were signed by only one nurse instead of two, and in some cases there was no nurse signature at all. The Director of Nursing (DON) later confirmed that the medications for these residents were never entered into the narcotic records and that the declining count sheets were missing. For each of the nine residents, the surveyors verified that controlled medications had been ordered by a practitioner and dispensed by the pharmacy, but the facility lacked the required inventory logs to track receipt and use of these medications. For example, one cognitively intact resident with an order for scheduled tramadol had 30 tablets documented as delivered by the pharmacy, signed as received by a night-shift nurse, but no second nurse signature and no declining count sheet could be found. Another resident with severely impaired cognition and an as-needed oxycodone order had two separate deliveries of 60 tablets each documented by the pharmacy, yet there were no nurse signatures on one delivery sheet and no declining count sheets for either shipment. Similar patterns occurred for residents with diagnoses such as cancer, heart failure, CVA, arthritis, diabetes, renal disease, and deep vein thrombosis, all of whom had active controlled medication orders and documented pharmacy deliveries without corresponding facility inventory records. Interviews and record reviews showed that the facility’s process for handling controlled medication deliveries contributed to the deficiency. The DON stated that when controlled medications were delivered, whichever nurse was available would distribute medications from the delivery tote to the medication carts and sign the delivery sheet, even though the form had two signature lines intended for both the nurse checking in the medications and the nurse receiving them on the cart. The DON acknowledged that two nurses were not consistently signing the delivery sheets, that she did not verify that medications documented as delivered were actually placed on the carts, and that missing medications were not recorded in the narcotic book. An internal audit initiated after one resident’s tramadol could not be located revealed that eight additional residents had missing controlled medications for active orders, and the facility ultimately identified a total of 660 missing controlled tablets for active orders. Staff interviews indicated that a specific medication aide had been acting suspicious, and subsequent drug testing of staff showed that this aide tested positive for the missing medications, coinciding with the period in which the controlled medications and required documentation were absent. Additional interviews with the Chief Nursing Officer, Nurse Consultant, pharmacy director, and nurse practitioners further described how ordering and dispensing practices led to excessive quantities of controlled medications being present on medication carts without adequate tracking. One nurse practitioner reported that during monthly pain assessments she routinely ordered refills for controlled pain medications without first checking with nursing staff to determine if refills were needed, and the pharmacy director stated that the pharmacy would refill controlled medications when orders were received if they had not been filled in a while. These practices resulted in large amounts of controlled medications being stored on the carts. Although facility leadership and pharmacy representatives later described changes to ordering and refill processes, the surveyors noted that the facility-provided corrective action plan could not be validated.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A resident with cerebral infarction and cognitive communication deficit gave $280 to the Medical Records Manager after staff were asked to clean his apartment before discharge. Although the Administrator said the facility would pay staff and the resident would have no out-of-pocket expense, the Medical Records Manager accepted the money, placed it in her work bag, and did not refuse it at the time. Transportation staff reported seeing the exchange, and the DON later confirmed the funds had been returned to the resident.
An RN diverted controlled medications belonging to two residents, including pain meds ordered for a resident with dementia and a resident with multiple fractures and cognitive deficits. The RN was stopped by police after leaving work and was found with facility medications in the residents’ names. The DON stated that prior narcotic counts relied on matching log sheets and counting individual contents, and staff did not detect the missing meds because the corresponding narcotic logs were also absent.
Misappropriation of Resident Property: A resident with multiple chronic conditions and mild cognitive impairment had a debit card stolen and used without authorization by a facility employee. The resident’s daughter reported the missing card, the Administrator confirmed the unauthorized charge, and police later identified the employee using the card and arrested her.
An LPN documented PRN pain meds as given to multiple residents, but residents said they had not requested or received them. For one resident, pain assessments and blood levels were inconsistent with the MAR entries, and similar concerns were identified for several other residents involving controlled PRN meds.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and chronic pain had an oxycodone/APAP order with two 30-count cards received. Staff accounts showed the narcotic count sheet was altered, signatures were written on it, and the original paperwork was discarded. One CMA said she destroyed the wrong medication after believing it was discontinued and admitted she did not complete the required checks or have a second staff member present. The medication, card, and count sheet were never found after searches of the cart, trash, shred bins, and dumpster.
An employee admitted to taking money from petty cash and the Resident Trust cash box, and an audit confirmed shortages in both accounts. The employee self-reported the theft, and the record review documented the missing funds and the discrepancy between the ledger totals and the cash on hand.
Misappropriation of Resident Funds by Staff Member
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of personal funds when the Medical Records Manager accepted $280 from Resident #60 for cleaning his personal apartment. The facility’s policy defined misappropriation of resident property as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident’s belongings or money without the resident’s consent, and the facility’s code of ethics prohibited accepting gifts or gratuities from a patient or family member. Resident #60 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and cognitive communication deficit, and a quarterly MDS dated 3/11/26 indicated he was cognitively intact. The Administrator had asked the Activities Director and the former Medical Records Manager to clean the resident’s apartment before discharge, and the Administrator stated the facility would pay them so the resident would have no out-of-pocket expense. Despite this, the resident was later taken to the Medical Records Manager’s home while transportation staff were involved in moving him between locations related to his apartment and rent arrangements. Multiple staff accounts described the resident handing money to the Medical Records Manager at her home on 4/17/26. The Transportation Assistant stated she saw the resident reach into his pocket and give the Medical Records Manager money, and the Transportation Director stated the resident told him the money was because they were supposed to paint his apartment. The Medical Records Manager stated she accepted the money, put it in her work bag, and did not return it at the time. The DON stated the Medical Records Manager later returned $280 to the facility, and the money was counted back to the resident with a signed receipt. The facility’s investigation concluded the Medical Records Manager had accepted money from the resident, and the report identified this as the deficient practice.
Controlled medications from two residents were diverted by an RN
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from the wrongful use of their belongings or money when a staff RN diverted controlled medications belonging to two residents. Resident 68 was admitted with diagnoses including a right humerus fracture, pneumonia, and dementia, and had orders for Pregabalin and oxyCODONE for pain. Resident 73 was admitted with diagnoses including multiple left rib fractures, a left clavicle fracture, a history of traumatic brain injury, and cognitive communication deficit, and had an order for oxyCODONE-acetaminophen for pain. On 1/15/26, the State Survey Agency received a facility-reported incident stating that an RN was stopped by police after leaving work and was found in possession of medications from the facility in the names of the two residents. The facility stated the medications were returned and that the residents did not miss doses. The incident involved Resident 68’s Pregabalin and oxyCODONE and Resident 73’s oxyCODONE, which had been removed from the facility while the RN was working the night shift. The DON stated that prior to the incident, narcotic counts were based on reconciling the narcotic log sheet and manually counting individual contents in blister cards or patches, but the total units of narcotics in the cart were not manually counted. The DON also stated that discontinued narcotics were kept in the medication cart until collected for destruction, and staff did not notice the missing medications for Residents 68 and 73 during shift change counts because the corresponding narcotic log sheets were also absent.
Misappropriation of Resident Property
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of property when the resident’s bank card was stolen and used without authorization by a facility staff member. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, C. difficile enterocolitis, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, muscle wasting, hypertension, and GERD, also had mild cognitive impairment per the MDS. The resident was discharged from the facility on 3/7/26. The facility’s incident report documented that the resident’s daughter reported the debit card was missing, and the Administrator later stated that the daughter reported unauthorized use of the card. The Administrator said the card was used for a one-time $30 charge, and the incident had already been reported to police. The Administrator further stated that police later came to the facility and showed images of an employee using the resident’s card without authorization, and the employee was arrested on the spot. The facility’s Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy stated its purpose was to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, and mistreatment of residents.
PRN Medications Documented as Given but Not Actually Administered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safety and security of resident property, specifically PRN medication, after it was discovered that an LPN was not actually giving PRN medications to assigned residents even though the medications were being documented as administered on the MAR. During the survey process, residents were asked about their PRN medication needs and use, and multiple residents stated they had not requested those medications despite the charting showing they had been given. This led the facility to investigate whether diversion was occurring. For Resident #64, the facility reviewed the MAR and pain assessments and found that the resident’s daily pain was generally documented as zero to one out of ten, while the PRN pain scale entries on the days in question showed pain levels of five to seven out of ten before medication administration and zero out of ten afterward. The facility also obtained blood work with the resident’s permission, which showed only trace amounts of pain medication in the resident’s system, inconsistent with the documented administrations. Similar concerns were identified for other residents, including Residents #1, #15, #39, #56, and #65, involving controlled PRN pain medications.
Missing Narcotic Medication and Altered Count Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of property when a prescribed narcotic medication became missing from the facility. Resident #6 had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 12 and diagnoses including intervertebral disk degeneration with lumbar and lower extremity pain. The resident had an order for oxycodone/acetaminophen 10/325 mg, 1 tablet by mouth twice daily, and the MAR and narcotic record showed two separate 30-count medication cards were received for the resident. The narcotic record and staff interviews showed that the medication count became inconsistent after the medication cards were handled on the medication cart. One staff member stated she received two narcotic cards for the resident and counted 60 tablets total with another nurse at shift change. Another staff member later stated she found the count sheet incorrect and reported that the count was off by a whole card of 30 tablets. The staff accounts also showed that the count sheet had been altered, with signatures written on it and the original paperwork no longer available. Staff interviews further showed that one CMA stated she destroyed the wrong narcotic medication after believing it had been discontinued in the EHR, and she admitted she did not complete the required checks before destroying it. She stated she removed the tablets, discarded the bubble pack in the medication cart trash, and placed the top of the medication card in the shred bin. Other staff stated narcotic destruction required two nursing staff present, but the medication and related paperwork for the resident were not found after searches of the carts, trash, shred bins, and dumpster. The Administrator stated the resident’s oxycodone/acetaminophen prescription had to be replaced because the medication was never found and had been removed from the facility.
Misappropriation of Resident Funds by Employee
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect resident funds from misappropriation when an employee admitted to taking $40.00 from petty cash and $240.00 from the Resident Trust cash. The incident occurred when the employee called to self-report that she had borrowed the money from both accounts. A statement from the employee confirmed the taking of the funds, and an audit of the financial records showed discrepancies in both the petty cash and Resident Trust cash box balances. The record review showed the petty cash General Ledger total was $200.00 while the actual cash counted was $159.65, with a cash withdrawal of $40.35 noted. The Resident Trust Cash Box General Ledger total was $250.00 while the actual cash counted was $10.00, with a cash withdrawal of $240.00 noted. The corporate Senior Financial Analyst later reviewed the accounts and found no additional missing funds. The report also states that the employee was terminated and a police report was filed after the theft was reported.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.