Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
D

Insulin Administered Outside Ordered Blood Sugar Parameters

Smithfield, North Carolina Survey Completed on 02-26-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure insulin was administered according to physician-ordered blood sugar (BS) parameters for a resident with diabetes mellitus type 2. The resident had an active order for Novolog insulin 10 units subcutaneously with meals, with instructions to hold the dose if BS was less than 150. Review of the December 2025 MAR showed that on four separate mornings, the nurse documented BS readings below 150 (122 on three dates and 106 on one date) and still administered 10 units of Novolog insulin at approximately 6:30 AM each time. Subsequent BS readings later those days were also documented, including elevated values and one instance where the resident refused a later BS check. During a telephone interview, the nurse stated she did not recall any parameters for the resident’s Novolog insulin and believed that if parameters existed, they would appear on the electronic MAR. She confirmed that her documentation indicated she administered 10 units of Novolog on the identified dates and times. The resident’s MDS showed he was cognitively intact, had no behaviors or rejection of care, and received insulin injections on most days in the look-back period. The NP reported familiarity with the resident, noting he frequently refused BS checks and insulin and that his BS tended to run high, but acknowledged that insulin should be given according to ordered parameters. The DON stated that administering insulin outside the physician’s parameters was considered a serious medication error, and the Administrator stated nurses should adhere to physician parameters when administering insulin.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙