Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0727
F

DON Inappropriately Used as Charge Nurse at High Census

Greenhurst, New York Survey Completed on 02-27-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that the Director of Nursing (DON) did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility’s average daily census exceeded 60 residents, as required by 10 NYCRR 415.13(b)(1). The DON job description stated that the DON was responsible for planning, directing, and coordinating nursing services, managing resident care 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and ensuring a sufficient number of qualified supervisory and supportive nursing personnel on each tour of duty. Census reports showed that during the review period the facility census ranged from 113 to 116 residents, and at survey entrance the census was 115 out of 135 beds. Despite this census level, daily staffing sheets from late January to mid-February documented that the DON was counted in the facility’s minimum staffing numbers for direct resident care. On specific evening shifts, the DON worked on a named unit from 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM as the second nurse, and on one of those dates, from 9:21 PM to 10:00 PM, the DON was the only nurse on the unit. The facility’s minimal staffing document required two nurses on that unit for the day and evening shifts, and the DON was used to meet those minimums. In interviews, the Facility Scheduler stated they were unaware that the DON was not supposed to act outside the DON role and acknowledged that the DON was used as staff when coverage could not be found, noting that the minimum staffing numbers were not ideal for completing work and providing good care. The DON reported not knowing the exact regulation, believing the practice was merely frowned upon, and stated they frequently acted as a CNA, housekeeper, or medication nurse while remaining available as DON. The Administrator confirmed that minimum staffing numbers were not the goal and that leadership was willing to help staff and residents when needed.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙