Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
E

Inaccurate PASARR Screenings for Residents With Mental Health Diagnoses

Albuquerque, New Mexico Survey Completed on 02-19-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure accurate completion of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screenings for multiple residents with documented mental health diagnoses. Record review showed that several residents were admitted with diagnoses such as major depressive disorder, depression, and anxiety disorders, yet their PASARR Level I forms indicated that they did not have mood, anxiety, or other qualifying mental health conditions. For example, one resident admitted with major depressive disorder had a PASARR Level I dated the same day of admission that documented no mood, panic, anxiety, personality, psychotic, depression, or substance-related disorders. Similar discrepancies were identified for additional residents. Another resident admitted with major depressive disorder had a PASARR Level I completed the day prior to admission that incorrectly indicated no mood or depression-related diagnoses. Residents with documented anxiety disorders also had PASARR Level I screenings that stated they did not have anxiety, mood, or related mental health conditions. Multiple residents with diagnoses of depression or major depressive disorder had PASARR Level I screenings completed on or near their admission dates that failed to acknowledge these conditions, instead marking that no such mental health diagnoses were present. During an interview, the Social Services Director reported that the facility did not have a systematic process in place to review incoming PASARRs as part of the admission screening process. The Social Services Director stated she had only recently been informed that reviewing resident PASARRs was the responsibility of her department and acknowledged that PASARRs were not being reviewed for accuracy. She confirmed that the PASARRs for all identified residents were inaccurate and stated that they should have reflected the residents’ documented mental health diagnoses.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙