Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Documentation of Resident Advance Directives Across Medical Record

Roswell, New Mexico Survey Completed on 12-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents’ advance directive wishes were consistently documented across the Electronic Health Record (EHR), MOST forms, physician orders, and care plans for multiple residents. For one resident, the EHR face sheet listed the code status as Attempt Resuscitation/CPR, the physician’s order directed Attempt Resuscitation/CPR, and the care plan documented the resident as Full Code, while the signed MOST form indicated the resident’s choice was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The DON confirmed that the MOST form conflicted with the face sheet, physician orders, and care plan, and acknowledged that all advance directive documentation should match throughout the chart. For a second resident, the admission record showed the resident’s entry into the facility, and the signed MOST form documented a choice of DNR, but the current physician orders directed Attempt Resuscitation/CPR and the care plan did not indicate any advance directive. For a third resident, the face sheet and MOST form both indicated DNR, but the physician’s orders listed the advance directive as Full Code/CPR and the care plan did not include any advance directive information. In interviews, the DON confirmed that the physician orders and care plans for these residents did not match the signed MOST forms and stated that this did not meet her expectations for consistent documentation of advance directives.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙