F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
E

Failure to Follow Oxygen Therapy Orders and Document Respiratory Assessments

Socorro Wellness & RehabilitationSocorro, New Mexico Survey Completed on 12-16-2025

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow professional standards of practice for oxygen therapy for three residents with chronic respiratory conditions. One resident with chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and simple chronic bronchitis had a physician’s order for continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 1–2 LPM. Surveyors observed this resident sitting in a wheelchair without a nasal cannula, with the oxygen concentrator turned off, and the resident stated he only wore oxygen at night and as needed during the day. On another observation in the dining area, the resident again was not wearing a nasal cannula and did not have a portable oxygen concentrator. An LPN and the ADON both stated that the resident used oxygen at night and as needed during the day, despite the physician’s order for continuous oxygen, and the ADON stated staff were expected to ensure residents wore oxygen as ordered and notify the provider if a change in condition indicated the order might need to be changed. A second resident, admitted with COPD, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, a solitary pulmonary nodule, and dependence on supplemental oxygen, had conflicting oxygen orders between hospice and the facility. Hospice admission orders directed oxygen via nasal cannula at 8–10 LPM, while the physician’s order in the facility record specified 6–8 LPM for COPD. Progress notes documented that staff found the resident’s oxygen concentrator at 10 LPM and educated him that it should be at 8–10 LPM, but there was no documentation that a provider was notified or that a full respiratory assessment was completed. Subsequent notes showed the concentrator was decreased to 15 LPM (outside the 6–8 LPM order, with no documentation of the prior setting), and that hospice was notified, but again there was no documented respiratory assessment beyond oxygen saturation. Another entry described an episode of shortness of breath with oxygen saturation dropping to 42%, treatment with ordered albuterol and anxiety medications, and oxygen increased to 14 LPM, outside the ordered range, without documentation of a respiratory assessment or provider notification. An LPN later stated she was not aware of the hospice order for 8–10 LPM, that the resident usually had oxygen at 10 LPM, and that although she assessed lung sounds, she never documented a respiratory assessment. The ADON confirmed staff were expected to assess respiratory status at least every shift, ensure facility orders matched hospice admitting orders, and notify the provider if higher oxygen concentrations were needed. A third resident with chronic respiratory failure had admission orders for continuous oxygen starting at 2 LPM and increasing to keep oxygen saturation greater than 90%. The physician’s order in the record, however, was entered as an order to increase oxygen requirement by 2 LPM to keep oxygen saturation greater than 90%, which did not match the admission order to start at 2 LPM. During one observation, the resident was in bed wearing a nasal cannula with the concentrator set at 3 LPM. On a later observation, the resident was in bed with the nasal cannula lying on the oxygen concentrator, the concentrator turned off, and the resident stated staff had put her to bed after lunch and forgot to put her oxygen on. An LPN confirmed the resident should always wear her nasal cannula, that the concentrator was usually set at 3 LPM, that the order was to start at 2 LPM and increase to keep saturation above 90%, and that at the time of observation the resident was not wearing the nasal cannula and should have been. A regional clinical nurse later confirmed the oxygen order had been entered incorrectly and reiterated that residents should wear oxygen as ordered unless they refuse, with physician notification and documentation required if they refuse. The report states that if the facility is not assessing respiratory status and following orders for oxygen use, the resident may be low on oxygen, which could potentially cause health concerns such as shortness of breath, confusion, rapid heart rate, fatigue, and cyanosis.

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Resources

Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:

See other F0695 citations
Missing Oxygen Order and Improper Nebulizer Storage
D
F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Short Summary

Missing Oxygen Order and Improper Nebulizer Storage: A resident receiving oxygen for sleep apnea had no physician order specifying the oxygen delivery rate, even though staff were setting the rate. In a separate observation, a resident’s nebulizer mask was left unbagged on the nightstand while not in use. An LPN and the DON both stated respiratory equipment should be stored in a bag when not in use, and the facility policy required bagged storage between uses.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Respiratory equipment was not maintained and stored per standards
E
F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Short Summary

Respiratory care was not provided in accordance with standards for several residents receiving oxygen and nebulizer treatments. Staff observed outdated oxygen tubing and humidification equipment, a nebulizer mouthpiece left out with tubing touching the floor, and oxygen supplies not stored properly. One resident’s oxygen was running at a higher flow than ordered, and staff confirmed the tubing and humidification items should be changed weekly and documented.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Improper Storage and Dating of Oxygen and CPAP Equipment
D
F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Short Summary

Improper Storage and Dating of Oxygen and CPAP Equipment: Two residents had oxygen equipment and CPAP items observed out of proper storage, including nasal cannula tubing on the floor, undated or empty humidifiers, and a CPAP mask on the floor. One resident had OSA with an order for oxygen at bedtime and as needed, and the other had COPD with orders for nightly CPAP and continuous oxygen. Staff stated the tubing, humidifier, and CPAP mask should be stored and dated per facility practice, and the facility policy required weekly changes and dating of oxygen equipment.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Contaminated oxygen tubing was placed back on a resident
D
F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Short Summary

A resident receiving continuous O2 via nasal cannula had the cannula found on the floor while the concentrator was running. A CNA placed the cannula back on the resident’s face before an LVN identified it as contaminated and replaced the cannula and tubing. The resident had diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease and atherosclerotic heart disease, and the care plan called for O2 at 2 L/min to maintain O2 sats above 92%.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Respiratory Equipment Not Stored Sanitarily
D
F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Short Summary

A resident with COPD, a respiratory infection, continuous O2, and CPAP therapy had CPAP and nasal cannula tubing observed lying on the bed and the CPAP mask draped over the machine instead of being stored in a sanitary container. Staff interviews showed inconsistent understanding of how to store the respiratory equipment, and the facility did not provide the requested storage of the equipment when not in use.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Respiratory Equipment Not Properly Labeled or Stored
D
F0695 F695: Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Short Summary

Respiratory equipment was not properly changed, labeled, or stored for a resident receiving nebulizer treatment. An undated aerosol mask attached to a nebulizer was observed on the resident’s nightstand, open to air, and remained there on a later observation. An LPN confirmed the mask was open to air and not stored properly, and the DON confirmed the mask and tubing had not been dated or stored properly.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation search

Search every citation & Plan of Correction

Go to search
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across New Mexico

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in New Mexico — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

Trusted data from CMS and state health departments

Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.

In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.

The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.

Get the Survey-Prep Report
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙