F0760

D

Failure to Transcribe and Administer Ordered Potassium Resulting in Multiple Missed Doses

Thief River Falls, Minnesota Survey Completed on 02-19-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors when a prescribed potassium supplement was not properly transcribed and implemented, resulting in multiple missed doses. The resident was admitted from the hospital with a history of CVA, UTI, hypokalemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, arteriosclerotic disease, and recent stroke with severely impaired cognition, aphasia, and disorganized thinking. Hospital documentation showed hypokalemia with a potassium level of 3.1 mEq/L on the day of discharge and a plan for approximately one month of potassium supplementation, with an e-prescribed order for potassium chloride 10 mEq twice daily. The hospital pharmacy confirmed receipt of the e-prescription and delivered potassium tablets to the facility on the day of admission, and the facility’s care plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered and report abnormal labs.

Despite the hospital’s e-prescribed order and delivery of potassium, the medication was not entered into the facility’s EMAR on admission and was not included on the interagency transfer discharge orders. A TMA received the potassium from the pharmacy, verified it against the packing slip, and noted that potassium was not listed on the EMAR. The TMA did not administer the medication and instead placed the potassium on the counter in the medication room with a sticky note, consistent with an informal practice she described, but there was no documented communication to the charge nurse, RCC, or DON. The potassium remained on the counter through multiple shifts without being investigated or reconciled with the resident’s orders, and the DON later confirmed that the medication stayed in the medication room and that there should have been follow-up when potassium arrived without a corresponding order.

The missed potassium order was eventually discovered days later by a night-shift RN who, while checking the medication cart, found the potassium card untouched and recognized this as a red flag. This RN searched the hospital’s electronic record, located the provider’s potassium order, printed and scanned it into the resident’s chart, and entered it into the facility’s orders and EMAR on 1/18. Facility documentation, including a medication error report prepared by the DON, identified that the resident potentially missed at least six doses of potassium between the evening of admission and the start of administration on 1/18. The primary provider stated she was unaware of the missed doses and indicated that nursing staff should have followed facility protocol and notified a provider when potassium doses were missed in the context of a low potassium lab value. The DON acknowledged that multiple process failures occurred, including lack of follow-up when the potassium arrived without an order and failure to ensure the order was placed in the EMAR, and confirmed that missed doses of potassium constituted a medication error.

Later clinical events documented in the record showed that the resident was sent to the ER on one occasion for a fall with a trimalleolar ankle fracture, at which time potassium was 3.8 mEq/L, and on another occasion for hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, acute renal failure, and severe dehydration, with a potassium level of 7.2 mEq/L. However, the deficiency cited in the survey focused specifically on the facility’s failure to transcribe and implement the potassium order upon admission and the resulting missed doses from the date of admission until the order was entered into the EMAR. The facility’s own medication error document characterized these missed doses as a medication error and noted that no notifications were documented on the error form and that the form was incomplete.