Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Keep Call Lights Within Reach for Two Residents

Montpelier, Idaho Survey Completed on 02-19-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors determined the facility failed to ensure residents’ call lights were within reach, as required by the facility’s undated “Call System, Residents” policy, which states each resident must be provided a means to call staff directly for assistance from the bed, toileting/bathing areas, and from the floor. Resident #35, admitted with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and high blood pressure, was observed on 2/17/26 at 10:27 AM sitting in a recliner placed on the left side of her bed while her call light was lying on the nightstand on the right side of the bed, out of her reach. At 10:30 AM, LPN #1 confirmed the call light should have been within Resident #35’s reach and was not. Resident #30, admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and repeated falls, was observed on 2/17/26 at 1:25 PM sitting in a recliner on the right side of his bed while his call light was pinned to the room curtain on the left side of the bed, also out of his reach. At 1:42 PM, LPN #1 acknowledged that Resident #30’s call light should have been within reach and was not, and at 2:52 PM the Administrator likewise stated that resident call lights should be within residents’ reach and had not been in these instances. These findings, based on policy review, observation, record review, and staff interview, showed that for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for residents’ rights, the facility did not reasonably accommodate residents’ needs and preferences by ensuring their call lights were accessible.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙