Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Implement Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review Recommendation

Delmar, Delaware Survey Completed on 12-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a consultant pharmacist’s medication regimen review (MRR) recommendation was implemented and appropriately followed up for one resident. Facility policy titled "Medication Regimen Review and Reporting" required the consultant pharmacist to review each resident’s medication regimen and medical chart at least monthly and for the facility to follow up on recommendations in a timely manner, including obtaining physician acceptance or rejection with documented rationale. Resident #37, admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral atherosclerosis and assessed as having severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 3), had an active order for lactobacillus capsules, two capsules by mouth once daily, related to cerebral atherosclerosis. The pharmacy MRR dated 09/02/2025 contained a recommendation to add a strength to the lactobacillus order because the existing order lacked a specified strength. Despite this recommendation, the order for lactobacillus was not corrected to include a strength, and there was no evidence that the physician had reviewed or responded to the pharmacist’s recommendation. The LPN Unit Manager was unable to locate an MRR with the physician’s signature for this resident, and the consultant pharmacist confirmed that the recommendation had not been acted upon and reiterated that every medication order must include a strength. The resident’s primary physician stated that if he had seen the recommendation, he would have signed it and agreed that lactobacillus is available in different strengths and the dosage should be specified. The DON stated she expected staff to maintain a copy of the signed MRR for each resident and that physicians should respond to pharmacist recommendations within a day or two, and the Administrator stated MRRs should be completed and followed up on in a timely manner, confirming that the pharmacist’s recommendation for this resident’s lactobacillus order was not followed up as required.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙