Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
G

Failure to Consistently Supervise High-Risk Resident to Prevent Falls

New Castle, Delaware Survey Completed on 12-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to consistently implement fall-prevention interventions and adequate supervision for a resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, dementia with agitation, and multiple prior falls. The resident was admitted with significant cognitive impairment, as evidenced by an incomplete BIMS due to poor cognition, and was assessed as high risk for falls with a fall risk score of 19. The quarterly MDS documented that the resident was dependent on staff for transfers and had experienced two or more falls with no or minor injury since the prior assessment. The resident’s care plan, updated after multiple falls and a hip fracture, identified the resident as high risk for falls and included interventions such as close supervision when in the wheelchair/Broda chair, frequent monitoring when in bed, and getting the resident out of bed to a Broda chair or common area when awake at night. Despite these identified risks and care-planned interventions, facility documentation and staff practices did not reflect consistent monitoring or supervision. Review of the MARs, TARs, and CNA documentation from October through December showed no entries indicating that the resident was being monitored to prevent falls, and monitoring was not listed as a fall intervention in those records. Incident/accident reports revealed a pattern of unwitnessed and unsupervised falls on numerous occasions, often in the hallway or near the nurse’s station, with the resident unable to explain how the falls occurred. These falls included multiple events from the resident’s wheelchair or Broda chair and culminated in a fall resulting in a left hip fracture, after which the resident was hospitalized and later returned to the facility. Direct observations by surveyors further demonstrated lapses in supervision inconsistent with the care plan and staff expectations. On several observed occasions, the resident was in a Broda chair in hallways, common areas, and even stuck in a staff office, propelling himself and at times attempting to stand, without staff present to monitor him. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was known to be at high risk for falls, was impulsive, and was supposed to remain within line of sight of staff at all times when up in the Broda chair. The DON, Administrator, Regional VP of Operations, and Regional Nurse all confirmed that the resident was expected to be in line of sight when up in the Broda chair due to his high fall risk. The facility’s fall prevention policy required assessment of fall risks and implementation of preventative measures when risks were identified, but the repeated unwitnessed falls and lack of documented monitoring showed that these measures were not consistently carried out, resulting in a fall with major injury (hip fracture).

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙