Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0710
D

Failure to Monitor and Follow Up Abnormal Glucose Labs for Diabetic Resident

Fremont, California Survey Completed on 02-23-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the failure of the attending physician to provide appropriate laboratory orders and follow-up for a resident with type 2 diabetes who was receiving oral sitagliptin. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score 6/15), malnutrition, and type 2 diabetes, was admitted in March 2024 with an order for sitagliptin. A lab report dated 3/16/2024 showed a hemoglobin A1C of 10.8% and an estimated average glucose of 263 mg/dL, which the DON and MD both described as elevated and very high, warranting additional orders. The lab results were reviewed in the EHR by the ADON, and the facility’s process was that abnormal labs should be communicated to the MD via fax, phone, or text. However, the MD stated that the 3/16/2024 lab report was not reviewed by him and that he relied on nursing staff to notify him of abnormal results, and he did not follow up on ordered lab results independently. A subsequent Comprehensive Metabolic Panel collected on 2/21/2025 showed a glucose level of 273 mg/dL, which the MD also stated was high and warranted MD notification for additional orders. Medical Records and the Administrator reported that although the MD had access to the facility’s EHR, he used a personal EHR system, and MR uploaded SOAP notes, history and physicals, lab results, past medical history, and current medications into that system monthly per the MD’s request. The facility’s diabetes clinical protocol required the provider to order desired glucose targets and monitoring regimes and to assess glycemic status by A1C and blood glucose monitoring, and the lab/diagnostic testing policy required the physician to identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on residents’ needs. Despite these policies and the abnormal lab findings, there were no documented additional lab orders for routine monitoring, and the resident was later admitted to a general acute care hospital with altered mental status, lethargy, confusion, partial responsiveness, and weakness, where a lab result showed blood glucose greater than 800 mg/dL.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙