Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Document Foley Catheter Necessity and Care Plan Leading to UTI

Riverside, California Survey Completed on 02-05-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to document clinical findings supporting the need for an indwelling Foley catheter (IFC) and to initiate a care plan addressing its use for one resident. The resident was admitted with right-sided weakness and paralysis following a cerebral infarction and was documented on a Minimum Data Set as always incontinent of bladder without an indwelling catheter. Subsequent physician orders entered by an LVN initiated IFC care and catheter orders first for urinary retention and later for neurogenic bladder, but these orders were later discontinued and then re-entered for neurogenic bladder. The resident’s care plan did not contain any care plan addressing IFC use, and there was no documented evidence in the medical record of urinary retention, neurogenic bladder, or other clinical findings demonstrating the necessity for the IFC. The resident was later transferred to a general acute care hospital with an IFC in place and was found to have lethargy, yellow urine with sediment draining from the catheter, and a urinalysis showing signs of infection; he was admitted for altered mental status secondary to a urinary tract infection. A CNA reported that the resident had an IFC “for a while” and did not know why it was in place. The LVN who entered the catheter orders stated that residents may need an IFC for urinary retention or a diagnosis requiring it, but he could not recall why this resident needed an IFC and acknowledged there was no documentation to support the need. The DON confirmed there was no care plan for the IFC and stated that a change in urinary status should have prompted a change-of-condition assessment, physician and family notification, and initiation of a care plan. The facility’s own policy required documentation of clinical or medical conditions demonstrating the need for an indwelling catheter and inclusion of catheter use in the plan of care, which was not done in this case.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙