Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Advance Directive Documentation for Two Residents

Scottsdale, Arizona Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that advance directives were accurately completed and consistently maintained in the clinical records of two residents. For one resident with multiple diagnoses including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, schizoaffective disorder, intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, and major depressive disorder, a physician’s order documented full code status. However, a pre-hospital medical care directive signed by the resident indicated that the resident did not want CPR and was DNR. Despite this, the face sheet and care plan both listed the resident as full code, while the care plan goal stated that the resident’s end-of-life wishes would be honored. For a second resident with extensive medical conditions including kyphosis, hypertension, Type 2 DM with neuropathy, spinal stenosis, atherosclerotic heart disease, vascular dementia, mood disturbance, GERD, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, COPD, dysphagia, and major depressive disorder, both a VA Advance Directive and a pre-hospital medical care directive signed by the resident documented DNR status and refusal of CPR. In contrast, the face sheet, care plan, progress notes, and a physician’s order all identified this resident as full code. Staff interviews confirmed that advance directives are initiated on admission and reviewed quarterly, that staff are expected to check both physical and electronic charts for code status, and that a specific form is required to document changes with updates to the EHR by medical records. The DON confirmed that discrepancies existed in both residents’ records and acknowledged that this could result in residents’ end-of-life wishes not being honored, contrary to facility policy on advance directives.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙