Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Accessible Call Light for High-Risk Resident

Pecos, Texas Survey Completed on 01-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to reasonably accommodate a resident’s needs and preferences by not ensuring the call light was within reach while the resident was in bed. During an observation, the resident was found lying in bed with the call light hanging from the privacy curtain toward the foot of the bed, approximately six feet away and not accessible to him. When asked, the resident stated he could not reach the call light and explained that if he needed help and could not reach it, he would yell until staff came to assist him. The resident was an elderly male with severe cognitive impairment, impaired communication, unsteadiness on his feet, repeated falls, dysphagia, malnutrition, orthostatic hypotension, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, metabolic encephalopathy, subclinical hypothyroidism, urinary tract infection, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. His MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and documented that he required substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting hygiene, dressing, and personal hygiene, and that he had impaired balance and was a high fall risk. His care plan identified multiple problem areas, including fall risk and impaired communication, and included interventions such as reminding him to use the call device and ensuring the call light was within reach. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the call light was not within reach and that this placement was inconsistent with expectations. CNA staff, a hospitality aide, an RN, the Administrator, and the DON all stated that call lights were supposed to be within reach of residents, and several specifically noted that in this case the call light was clipped to or hanging from the privacy curtain away from the resident. The DON also stated that the resident had a prior fall and that fall precautions included placing the call light within reach, along with a low bed and fall mat. Review of the facility’s “Call System, Resident” policy did not reveal any specific language addressing the use, placement, or requirement of call lights.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙