Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Wound Care Plans and Follow Existing Wound Interventions
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timeframes for residents with wounds, and failure to follow an existing wound care plan. For one resident, a female with moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses including cancer, heart failure, and sepsis risk, the care plan identified her as at risk for skin alterations and documented an unstageable wound to the buttock. The care plan interventions included monitoring the site for signs and symptoms of infection, monitoring treatment effectiveness, notifying the physician as needed, and performing weekly skin assessments. Physician orders dated mid-month directed specific wound care to the coccyx, but the treatment administration record showed at least one missed treatment. Progress notes documented a reopened wound to the sacrum and buttocks and a weekly skin/wound note indicated an unstageable coccyx pressure injury with malodor, necrotic tissue, and detailed wound characteristics. Despite these findings, there was no evidence that the wound was consistently monitored for infection or that the physician was notified of changes in the wound’s condition. On the day of a family outing, nursing documentation reflected that the resident was described as stable and left with her responsible party for holiday celebrations with portable oxygen. The facility had previously informed the responsible party only that the resident had a “hot spot” on her bottom and was receiving treatment, without disclosing the severity of the wound. That same evening, the responsible party observed the wound at home, described it as large, dark, and unstageable with necrotic tissue and surrounding deep red tissue, and took the resident to the hospital. Emergency department documentation noted an unstageable decubitus ulcer to the coccyx with foul odor and necrotic tissue. Interviews revealed that the CNA who first saw the open wound on the resident’s buttocks notified an LVN, who estimated the wound as dime-sized but did not measure it and did not continue to visualize it after the initial date. Another CNA later reported noticing the wound appearing more open and notified a nurse. The wound care nurse practitioner evaluated the wound several days before the outing, documented an unstageable coccyx pressure ulcer with significant slough and eschar, ordered Dakin’s solution and iodoform packing, and requested a wound culture, but stated she was not notified about the wound until she arrived at the facility and that the facility should have notified her or the physician before the wound worsened. The facility physician confirmed he was only notified once about the wound and did not assess it between its identification and the resident’s transfer out. A second resident, a male with intact cognition and diagnoses including heart failure, wound infection, paraplegia, malnutrition, and chronic bone infection, had documented wounds including a Stage III pressure ulcer and chronic leg ulcers. His care plan addressed only a non-pressure chronic ulcer to the right leg, with interventions to monitor and document the wound’s location, size, and treatment, and to report abnormalities and signs of infection to the physician. There was no care plan in place for his chronic ulcer on the left leg or for the pressure ulcer on the sacrum, despite physician orders for wound care to both lower legs and the coccyx. Additionally, this resident was not listed on the facility’s wound report, even though the wound care nurse and DON acknowledged he had a pressure ulcer and two leg wounds and that the wound care nurse had already been providing wound care. The wound care nurse stated she was responsible for ensuring wound care plans were written and used them to educate staff, but could not explain why the care plan for the first resident was not followed or why the second resident lacked care plans for all of his wounds. The facility’s own policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timeframes that describe services to meet residents’ physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, but the documented practices for these two residents did not meet those requirements. The situation for the first resident escalated to an Immediate Jeopardy determination after it was identified that the resident’s wound site was not monitored for signs and symptoms of infection, the effectiveness of treatment was not evaluated, and the physician was not notified of wound changes, despite the presence of an unstageable coccyx pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue and malodor. The resident was taken out of the facility by her responsible party, who then sought emergency care after observing the wound. Hospital records documented an unstageable decubitus ulcer with foul odor and necrotic tissue, and the responsible party reported being told the resident had sepsis possibly due to the wound and that the resident later died. For the second resident, the absence of care plans for all documented wounds and the omission from the wound report represented additional failures to ensure that comprehensive, person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for residents with wounds, as required by facility policy and regulatory standards.
Removal Plan
- Resident #3's care plan was updated to reflect the current state of their wound and interventions per the interdisciplinary team's discussion.
- All residents with wounds were reviewed to ensure the care plans are reflecting the residents' current wound status.
- Regional Nurse Consultant will educate Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Treatment Nurse, and MDSC Nurse over the care plan policy with emphasis on care planning wounds (wound location, type, stage), following physician orders, and ensuring care plans are comprehensive person-centered, consistent with resident rights, and include measurable objectives and time frames to meet medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs.
- All licensed nurses will be educated over the care plan policy with emphasis on care planning wounds (wound location, type, stage), following physician orders, and ensuring care plans are comprehensive person-centered, consistent with resident rights, and include measurable objectives and time frames to meet medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs.
- The Treatment Nurse and/or Designee will complete and update the care plans with any changes for wounds.
- The Director of Nursing or Designee will review the wound care plans to ensure they are present, accurate, and being followed.
- In Quality of Care meeting, the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Treatment Nurse, and/or Designee will review residents with wounds, weekly wound report from wound care nurse practitioner, facility wound report, wound care orders, and wound care plans to ensure accurate information is present and documented.
- Ad hoc QAPI performed with Medical Director to inform them of the Immediate Jeopardy and the facility's plan to remove the immediacy.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A resident with dementia, muscle weakness, and protein-calorie malnutrition had a care plan directing staff to offload his heels or use Prevalon boots while in bed. During observation, he was found in bed without the boots, and an LPN confirmed his heels were not offloaded even though they should have been.
Failure to care plan depression: A resident with MDD and ongoing depressive symptoms had psychology evaluations documenting depressed mood, loss of interest, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and appetite changes, and the MDS listed depression as an active dx. However, the care plan did not include depression as a focus area, and the MDS Coordinator and DON both stated it should have been care planned.
Incomplete care planning for ordered medications and diabetic footwear. The facility did not include ordered meds such as Eszopiclone, Lexapro, Mirtazapine, and Zolpidem in residents' comprehensive care plans, and one resident was not measured for diabetic shoes and insoles per MD order. The MDS Coordinator said the missing medication care plans were an oversight, while the DON and Administrator stated care plans are used to direct and guide resident care.
A facility failed to include person-centered comprehensive care plan focus areas for two residents receiving ordered meds. One resident with atrial fibrillation was receiving Eliquis, and another resident with insomnia was receiving Trazodone, but neither current care plan addressed the medication use. The MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for care plan development and said the omissions were due to oversight.
Failure to update a resident’s fall care plan with a Geri-chair intervention. A resident with dementia, osteoarthritis, diabetes, severe cognitive impairment, and a history of falls had a care plan listing multiple fall precautions, but after a witnessed fall and a physician order for a Geri-chair or tilt back WC, the care plan was not updated to include that intervention. Surveyors observed the resident in a Geri-chair, and the MDS Coordinator and DON acknowledged the care plan had not been updated.
Failure to care plan a resident’s impaired hearing. A resident with dementia and a history of hard of hearing was observed unable to hear normal conversation and stated he refused to use his hearing aid. The SSD and RN confirmed no care plan had been initiated for the hearing impairment or hearing aid refusal, and the DON stated the condition should have been care planned per facility policy and MDS triggers.
Failure to Offload Heels as Directed
Penalty
Summary
Resident #32, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and protein-calorie malnutrition, had a care plan revised on 6/18/21 directing staff to offload his heels or use Prevalon boots when he was in bed, as he allowed. During observation on 7/9/26 at 11:22 AM, Resident #32 was found in bed without Prevalon boots in place. At 11:23 AM, an LPN stated the resident should have had his boots on, then lifted the blanket and observed the resident's legs resting on a pillow. When asked whether the resident's heels were offloaded, the LPN stated they were not and confirmed they should have been offloaded.
Failure to Care Plan Depression
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #22, who had diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder and was documented by psychology evaluations as having recurrent, moderate depression. The resident’s evaluation notes described decreased interest in activities, persistent depressed mood, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and changes in appetite, with symptoms occurring on more than half of the days and causing moderate subjective distress. A later psychology note again documented persistent depressed mood, marked loss of interest, altered sleep patterns, and fatigue with moderate distress. The resident’s quarterly MDS dated 6/13/2026 documented an active diagnosis of depression in Section I, but the care plan did not include a focus area for depression. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated the resident had been followed by Balance Wellbeing since 12/2025, the diagnosis was entered on 5/20/2026, and depression was not included in the care plan but should be. The DON also stated the resident should be care planned for depression. The facility policy required a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident’s medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs and all services identified in the comprehensive assessment.
Incomplete Care Planning for Ordered Medications and Diabetic Footwear
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes for 3 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #12 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, malnutrition, and depression, and her physician orders included Eszopiclone for insomnia, Lexapro for depression, and Mirtazapine for protein-calorie malnutrition. Although these medications were active and administered, the comprehensive care plan dated 04/23/26 did not include care planning for Eszopiclone, Lexapro, or Mirtazapine. Resident #3 had diagnoses including PTSD, depression, and stroke, with a BIMS score of 08 indicating severely impaired cognition. Her physician order dated 06/01/26 included Zolpidem Tartrate 5 mg at bedtime for insomnia, and the MDS indicated she received a hypnotic medication during the look-back period. The comprehensive care plan did not indicate Zolpidem. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated she reviewed the records and did not see care plans for Resident #12's medications or Resident #3's Zolpidem, and said it was an oversight. Resident #2 was also identified in the deficiency statement as not being measured for diabetic shoes and diabetic insoles per physician order. The facility's policy stated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables is developed and implemented for each resident and revised as conditions change. The DON and Administrator stated that care plans were a team effort and used to direct and guide resident care, and that if care plans were not done properly, care could be missed.
Missing Care Plan Focus Areas for Anticoagulant and Antidepressant Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving anticoagulant medication. Resident #5 was admitted with atrial fibrillation and had a physician order for Eliquis 5 mg by mouth twice daily. The June 2026 MAR showed the resident received Eliquis as ordered, and the quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as moderately cognitively impaired and receiving anticoagulant medication. However, the resident’s current comprehensive care plan, last reviewed on 6/19/26, did not include a care plan focus area for anticoagulant medication use. The facility also failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving antidepressant medication. Resident #8 was admitted with insomnia and had a physician order for Trazodone 50 mg by mouth at bedtime. The June 2026 MAR showed the resident received Trazodone as ordered, and the quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as cognitively intact and receiving antidepressant medication. The resident’s current comprehensive care plan, last reviewed on 6/18/26, did not include a care plan focus area for antidepressant medication use. In both cases, the MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for developing the care plans and identified the missing care plan areas as an oversight.
Failure to Update Fall Care Plan With Geri-Chair Intervention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that included all of Resident #1’s fall interventions. Resident #1, a [AGE]-year-old female with dementia, osteoarthritis, and diabetes mellitus, had a quarterly MDS showing a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and was assessed as having falls with one fall without injury. Her comprehensive care plan identified her as being at risk for falls related to debility, advanced age, and behaviors, and included interventions such as a low bed with fall mat, tilt back wheelchair, staff education, correct positioning in chair, nonskid tape under the fall mat, use of a call light, monitoring for changes in condition, and a pommel cushion added to the chair. After Resident #1 experienced a witnessed fall from her wheelchair in the TV area, a physician order was entered for safety devices including a low bed, fall mat, and Geri-chair or tilt back wheelchair. At the time of survey observation, Resident #1 was seen in a Geri-chair in the TV area and stated she liked it and was comfortable in it. However, the care plan did not include the Geri-chair intervention. The MDS Coordinator stated she had seen Resident #1 in the Geri-chair but had not yet updated the care plan, and the DON stated whoever had the resident should have seen the order for the Geri-chair and updated the care plan.
Failure to Care Plan Hearing Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop an individualized, resident-centered care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to address Resident 33’s impaired hearing. Resident 33 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and abnormal gait and mobility, and the H&P documented a history of hard of hearing. The MDS dated 6/5/2026 indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making and had minimal difficulty hearing. During an observation and interview on 6/29/2026, Resident 33 was lying in bed and stated he could not hear the surveyor during a normal conversation, that he was hard of hearing, and that he refused to use his hearing aid. The SSD stated the resident had difficulty hearing, refused to use the hearing aid, and had no care plan initiated for impaired hearing. RN 2 later confirmed there was no care plan for the resident’s impaired hearing and that one should be in place to address the hearing impairment and refusal to use the hearing aid so staff could communicate effectively. The DON stated that a resident with impaired hearing should be care planned according to facility policy and that hearing impairment triggered on the MDS should be care planned, including refusal to use the hearing aid.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.