Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment of Resident Wounds

Arlington, Texas Survey Completed on 01-10-2026

Penalty

Fine: $187,220
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident’s MDS assessment accurately reflected his clinical status, specifically his skin conditions and wounds. The admission MDS for a male resident with diagnoses including heart failure, wound infection, paraplegia, malnutrition, chronic bone infection, and a Stage III pressure ulcer documented only the Stage III pressure ulcer and did not indicate any other wounds. However, the resident’s care plan identified an actual impairment to skin integrity related to a non-pressure chronic ulcer on the right leg, with interventions to monitor and document the wound and report abnormalities to the physician. Additionally, the facility’s wound care report showed that the resident had an atypical lesion on the right leg, an atypical lesion on the left leg, and a Stage III pressure ulcer on the coccyx, all present on admission. Surveyors were unable to interview the MDS Coordinator, who did not return calls. The DON stated she did not sign the MDS assessment for this resident and did not know who was responsible for ensuring MDS assessments were correct, though she acknowledged their importance for ensuring appropriate care interventions. The Corporate Nurse reported that she signed the MDS assessment to show it was completed, while the MDS Coordinator actually filled it out. Facility policy on resident assessments indicated that a comprehensive assessment includes completion of the MDS and that the interdisciplinary team uses the MDS form mandated by federal and state regulations to conduct the resident assessment. Despite this policy, the resident’s MDS did not accurately capture all existing wounds documented elsewhere in the record.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙