Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0580
D

Failure to Notify Resident Representative of New Narcotic Pain Medication Order

Dallas, Texas Survey Completed on 01-14-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to notify a resident’s designated Resident Representative (RR) of a significant change in treatment. A male resident with dementia and depression, admitted in mid-2025 and assessed as having intact cognition on a quarterly MDS, had an order for Tramadol HCl 50 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain, prescribed in late 2025. The resident’s admission forms, signed earlier in 2025, showed that the RR had consented to the resident receiving treatment at the facility. However, record review and interviews revealed that the RR was not notified when Tramadol, a narcotic pain medication, was prescribed. The RR reported she was unaware the resident was receiving Tramadol and believed she should have been informed of the physician’s orders, particularly because the resident was a recovering alcoholic. During interviews, the RR stated she had spoken with the Administrator, who told her the facility did not have to contact the RR because the resident was of sound mind. The Administrator and Chief Nursing Operator confirmed they believed that, since the resident was coherent and able to make his own decisions, the RR did not need to be notified of the new medication order and that the RR would only be contacted if the resident was not coherent. The DON and ADON stated they were unsure whether consent from the RR was required when a resident was of sound mind, but indicated they generally tried to keep the RR informed because she was frequently in communication with nursing staff. Review of the facility’s Resident Representative policy defined the RR as an individual chosen by the resident to act on the resident’s behalf in decision-making and to receive notifications, but the RR was not notified of the Tramadol order as required.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙