Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding of Oral/Dental Status

Childress, Texas Survey Completed on 01-28-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure an accurate MDS assessment for a resident’s oral/dental status. A male resident with Guillain-Barre syndrome, lack of coordination, and need for assistance with personal care was admitted and later readmitted to the facility. His annual MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 12, indicating he was cognitively intact, and Section L (Oral/Dental Status) was coded as "none of the above were present." The resident’s comprehensive care plan did not contain a focus area for dental care. During an observation and interview, the surveyor noted the resident had brown/discolored teeth, and the resident reported it had been a while since he had seen a dentist and that he likely needed to be placed back on a list to see a dentist due to some mouth pain. In a phone interview, the MDS nurse stated she completed the annual MDS and that the resident told her he did not have any mouth pain and did not need anything, but he would not allow her to look in his mouth. The MDS nurse acknowledged she must have been in a hurry and should have coded Section L as "unable to examine," which, per her statement, would have triggered a care plan decision in Section V. Initially, the Interim Administrator stated he did not think the MDS nurse had marked the dental status incorrectly, explaining that he understood she did not see any issues and therefore marked no issues. After further discussion, the Interim Administrator stated he did think the MDS nurse had marked the dental status incorrectly and confirmed the facility did not have its own MDS policy and followed the CMS RAI guidelines. The RAI User’s Manual excerpt cited in the report specifies that "unable to examine" should be checked if the resident’s mouth cannot be examined.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙