Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Report Suspected Financial Exploitation to Required Agencies

Sacramento, California Survey Completed on 01-09-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its abuse, neglect, and exploitation reporting policies and procedures when staff suspected financial exploitation of a resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and a need for assistance with personal care, and an MDS assessment indicated the resident was rarely or never understood. The business office identified that the resident’s conservator, who was also the resident’s sister and responsible person, had not paid the resident’s Medi-Cal share of cost since it began generating, while the Public Conservator’s office later found that the sister had been withdrawing the resident’s full monthly income except for bank fees. Despite these circumstances, no report of suspected financial abuse was made to the state agency, local ombudsman, APS, or law enforcement as required by facility policy and section 1150B of the Act. The Business Office Assistant stated that she called the resident’s sister weekly or every other week without response and suspected financial abuse, which she reported to the Social Services Director (SSD). The Business Office Manager confirmed that the share of cost had not been paid since March 2024 and documented an internal communication to the SSD requesting a financial abuse report for the resident. The SSD acknowledged difficulty reaching the sister and documented contacting the county Public Guardian’s Office to ask if a referral was appropriate, learning that the court had already initiated a process to transfer conservatorship. However, the SSD stated she did not suspect financial abuse at that time and confirmed that no abuse report was made regarding this resident. The Administrator reported that the facility’s process for any suspicion of abuse was to notify him first, then report the suspicion and conduct an internal investigation, and that the facility’s policy required reporting all suspicions of abuse, including financial abuse, to specified agencies. The Administrator agreed that the lack of response from the conservator and the nonpayment of share of cost for months were red flags, and confirmed that the resident’s share of cost started in March 2024 and was not paid by the conservator. The Director of Nursing stated that all suspicions of resident abuse should be reported so they can be thoroughly investigated. Review of the written policy confirmed that suspected abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation must be reported immediately to the Administrator and to state licensing/certification, the ombudsman, APS, and law enforcement, but no such reports were made in this case despite staff suspicions and internal communications referencing possible financial abuse.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙