Failure to Notify Residents and Families of Conversion From Medi-Cal to Private Pay
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to notify four residents and/or their responsible parties of changes in their primary payor status from Medi-Cal IEHP to private pay, as required by resident rights and the facility’s own policy. Record review showed that each of the four residents had Medi-Cal IEHP as the primary payor prior to January 1, 2026, and that their primary payor was changed to private pay effective January 1, 2026, in the PointClickCare (PCC) census records. The facility’s policy titled “Pay Source Conversion” states that Social Services is responsible for notifying the family of non-coverage and anticipated payment, and that the resident and/or responsible party must be informed of their financial obligations when there is a conversion from one primary pay source to another. Resident 2 was admitted with a history of transient ischemic attack and was documented as self-responsible, with an MDS indicating intact cognition. Resident 3 was admitted with dementia, also documented as self-responsible, and had an MDS indicating intact cognition. Resident 4 was admitted with dementia, had a responsible family member, and an MDS showing she was rarely/never understood with moderately impaired cognition. Resident 5 was admitted with metabolic encephalopathy and had an MDS indicating moderately impaired cognition. Despite these documented conditions and responsible party designations, interviews with Residents 2, 3, and 5 revealed that they were unaware they were currently paying privately for their stays, did not know the cost, and reported that no one had discussed these financial changes with them. Resident 4 was non-responsive at the time of attempted interview, and later her responsible party reported not receiving any notification of the payor change or information about the cost. Interviews with staff confirmed that required notifications were not provided. The Business Office Manager (BOM) stated that her department is responsible for notifying residents and responsible parties of payor changes via a notice of insurance change letter, but reported that the Director of Finance (DOF) at the corporate office initiated the payor changes on December 31, 2025, without informing her. The Accounts Receivable Director stated that the BOM, Administrator (ADM), or Social Services Director (SSD) should inform residents about becoming private pay. The Social Service Assistant stated that the BOM is responsible for payor changes and that she had never dealt with payor changes. The ADM stated the BOM is supposed to give notice of payor status changes to residents and report such changes in stand-up meetings, but he was not aware of the corporate-initiated changes and the BOM did not report any payor changes. The DOF stated that BOM, SSD, and sometimes ADM should explain payor changes and document their actions, and later clarified that no written Medi-Cal recommendation was received and that the decision to change the four residents to private pay was made at the facility level. These actions and inactions resulted in residents and responsible parties not being notified of the change from Medi-Cal to private pay and their resulting financial obligations.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to provide discharge planning and Medicare exhaustion notice for a resident. The resident’s record had no documentation of discharge planning, and facility leaders stated the resident was billed at the self-pay rate after Medicare days were exhausted without receiving a letter or other notice. The DON said she was not involved in the admission care plan process, and the Administrator stated the facility does not give residents documentation when Medicare days end and does not have a discharge policy.
Failure to document NOMNC delivery to a resident representative. For one resident sampled for beneficiary notification, Social Services completed the NOMNC verbally by phone, but the form had only one facility signature and there was no record that the notice was mailed to the representative. The DOSS confirmed the lack of documentation and stated the facility does not use certified mail.
The facility failed to provide SNF ABNs to two residents when Medicare Part A coverage ended, and their representatives were not given written notice of possible financial liability for non-covered skilled services. One resident had Alzheimer’s disease and was unable to make decisions, and the representative reported receiving bills without prior written notice. The BOM acknowledged the notices were not provided, and the ADM stated she was not clear on ABN policy and regulations.
A resident with a Medicare Part A episode was not provided the SNF-ABN and NOMNC, and the resident was too confused to sign the forms. Staff reported the resident had no DPOA, the brother signed admission paperwork, and an admin staff member stated the paperwork needs to be signed for the NOMNC and SNF-ABN.
A resident's MPOA did not receive timely NOMNC notice of the end of Medicare-covered skilled services. Facility policy required notice at least 2 days before the last covered day, but the phone notification was made after coverage had already ended, and the Social Services Designee confirmed the MPOA was not notified in advance.
The facility failed to provide a timely NOMNC to a resident with intact cognition. Record review showed Medicare Part A coverage ended before the NOMNC was signed, and the administrator confirmed there was no evidence the notice was given at least two calendar days before coverage ended. The resident stated she did not recall the form being reviewed with her, though she was okay with therapy ending.
Failure to Provide Medicare Exhaustion Notice and Discharge Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide discharge planning and a letter stating when Medicare days would be exhausted for one resident who was sampled for discharge rights. The resident’s face sheet showed an initial admission to the facility, and review of the electronic medical record, including progress notes from 2/2026 through 3/2026, found no documentation of discharge planning. During interview, the Social Services Director stated she began working at the facility in March 2026, after the resident’s admission, and described that discharge planning was discussed at an initial care plan meeting and at weekly Medicare meetings, though she had only attended one or two of those meetings. The Business Office Manager stated the resident’s 100th Medicare day was on 3/18/2026, that discharge paperwork was given on 3/24/2026, and that the resident was billed at the self-pay rate from 3/19/2026 through 3/25/2026. She confirmed the resident was not aware her Medicare days were exhausted during that time. The DON stated she was new to the facility and was not involved in the 72-hour admission care plan meeting, and the Administrator stated the facility does not give residents any documentation or letter when Medicare days are exhausted and does not have a discharge policy.
Failure to Document NOMNC Delivery to Representative
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was delivered to a resident representative for one of two residents sampled for beneficiary notification. For Resident #101, the NOMNC dated 11/26/25 indicated that Social Services called the resident representative on 11/24/25, but the form was signed by only one facility representative. During interview, the Director of Social Services confirmed that the NOMNC was completed verbally over the phone with only one staff signature, and stated that best practice is to have two signatures. She also stated she could not provide documentation that the NOMNC was mailed to the resident representative because the facility does not use certified mail and there was no documentation in the medical record showing that mailing occurred.
Failure to Provide SNF ABN for Medicare Coverage Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) for two sampled residents, Resident 86 and Resident 92, and therefore did not give written notice of Medicare coverage ending or potential financial liability for services not covered. During a concurrent interview and record review, the Business Office Manager stated that Resident 86’s last covered day for Medicare Part A was 4/16/2026 and Resident 92’s was 6/11/2026, and acknowledged that SNF ABNs were not provided in writing to either resident or their representatives. The Business Office Manager stated she was responsible for notifying residents or their representatives of changes in Medicare coverage and possible share of cost, and stated that failure to do so could leave them facing financial difficulties without being informed of changes in benefits or allowed to appeal those decisions. Resident 86’s record showed admission on 2/6/2026 with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s Disease, generalized muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The MDS indicated the resident was unable to make decisions for self. During interview, Resident 86’s representative stated they were not given any written notification of changes in Medicare coverage and were receiving bills from the facility. The Administrator stated she was not clear on Advanced Beneficiary Notice policies and regulations and acknowledged that if residents were not told their Medicare coverage was ending, they may be unaware of their potential financial responsibilities and share of costs. The facility policy stated that when Medicare may not pay for otherwise covered skilled services, the resident or representative is to be notified in writing of why the services may not be covered and of potential liability for payment.
Failure to Provide Medicare Non-Coverage Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (CMS-10055) and the Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS-10123) to Resident 18 or the resident’s representative. The resident’s EMR documented a Medicare Part A episode beginning 02/17/2026 and ending on 03/09/2026. On 06/22/2026, Administrative Staff B reported that Resident 18 was unable to sign the SNF-ABN and NOMNC because the resident was very confused. Administrative Staff B also reported that the resident did not have a DPOA and that the resident’s brother signed all admission paperwork. During an interview on 06/23/2026, Administrative Staff A stated that the paperwork needs to be signed for the NOMNC and SNF.
Late Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage to MPOA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate notice of the last covered Medicare A days to Resident #127's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). The facility policy stated that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) would be provided at least 2 days in advance of the last covered day to allow time to appeal if the beneficiary chose. For Resident #127, the NOMNC stated that Medicare coverage of current skilled services would end on 03/04/26, but the telephone notification to the MPOA was not made until 03/06/26 at 10:00 AM. During an interview, the Social Services Designee confirmed that the MPOA was not notified at least 2 days in advance of the end of Medicare-covered skilled services.
Late NOMNC Delivery
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was provided timely to one resident, R27, who had intact cognition on the quarterly MDS. Review of the resident’s SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms showed Medicare Part A coverage ending on 2/15/26 and again on 5/23/26, with NOMNC forms dated 6/15/26 and signed by the resident on that same date. During interview, R27 stated she did not recall anyone reviewing the form with her but said she was okay with her therapy services ending. The administrator later reviewed the record and confirmed there was no evidence the notice had been given at least two calendar days before the end of Medicare Part A coverage as required by the facility’s NOMNC policy.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.