Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Elopement of High-Risk Resident

Grass Valley, California Survey Completed on 01-15-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a very high elopement risk score of 14. The resident had diagnoses including unspecified dementia with anxiety and mood disturbance and was care planned with a goal that the resident would not leave the facility without a responsible party, with an intervention to assure an identification band or other form of identification was in place. Physician orders directed staff to check the placement of a wander guard on the resident’s left ankle every shift, monitor skin, and notify the physician as needed. Staff interviews revealed that the resident frequently attempted to elope and would remove or cut off the wander guard. According to the Director of Staff Development, the resident left the facility through a door near the smoking area, unlatched a gate, and walked to a road behind the facility, where a truck picked the resident up and transported the resident to a nearby apartment complex, and a person there called 911. A nurse who was present on the day of elopement stated she did not hear an alarm and confirmed the resident had a history of trying to elope and manipulating or removing the wander guard. During an observation in the resident’s room, the resident was not wearing an identification band, and the nurse confirmed this finding. The DON acknowledged that a wander guard is only effective when worn and that residents have the right to be safe in the facility. The facility’s wandering and elopement policy stated that the facility will identify residents at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙