Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
E

Failure to Report Multiple Abuse Allegations to State Agency

Suring, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 01-07-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report multiple allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) as required by its Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy. The policy, revised 7/1/25, directs staff to report all alleged violations to the Administrator, SA, Adult Protective Services, and other required agencies within specified timeframes, including within 2 hours for allegations involving abuse or serious bodily injury and within 24 hours for other events. Despite this, allegations that one CNA was rough with care and verbally abusive were not reported to the SA as facility-reported incidents. One cognitively intact resident with a history of left humerus fracture, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, anxiety disorder, and cellulitis reported being physically and mentally abused and yelled at for incontinence since admission. This resident stated that the CNA was rough with care, refused to get the resident out of bed to use the bathroom, forced use of a bedpan, and pinched or jabbed the resident’s hip during care, causing pain. The resident reported these concerns to the Nursing Home Administrator a few days after admission, stating feeling mentally and physically abused, but did not receive follow-up and did not believe the concerns were taken seriously. The Administrator’s progress note from a care conference documented the resident as anxious and tearful and declining therapy and medications, but did not document the specific concerns about the CNA. Additional residents with varying levels of cognition and medical conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, history of stroke, depression, peripheral vascular disease, osteoarthritis, chronic kidney disease, osteoporosis, edema, osteomyelitis of vertebra, severe septic shock, cerebral infarction, and spastic hemiplegia, reported that the same CNA was rough, aggressive, or mean with care and that they did not want this CNA in their rooms. Some residents described rough transfers, aggressive assistance with a urinal that caused pain, and fear of the CNA. Family members and multiple CNAs reported that residents had complained about the CNA being rough and short-tempered, and that there was a list of residents who would not allow the CNA in their rooms. A unit manager LPN reported these concerns to the DON. The Nursing Home Administrator, DON, and unit manager acknowledged that several residents did not want the CNA to provide care but attributed this to cultural and racial differences and denied receiving reports that the CNA was rough with care. No allegations of abuse related to this CNA were reported to the SA, despite the facility’s policy requiring such reporting.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙