Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
E

Failure to Obtain Physician Response to Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review Recommendations

Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 01-22-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations made by the consultant pharmacist were reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician or prescriber, as required by facility policy. The policy titled "Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report)" stated that recommendations are to be acted upon and documented by facility staff and/or the prescriber. For three residents, documentation showed that nursing staff acknowledged and implemented pharmacist recommendations, but there was no evidence that a physician had reviewed or addressed the identified irregularities. For one resident with heart failure and respiratory failure, the consultant pharmacist recommended on December 10, 2025, that additional monitoring be added for an anticonvulsant medication; a nurse signed the recommendation and documented "added to order," but there was no physician signature or documentation of physician review. For a second resident with heart failure and respiratory failure, the pharmacist recommended on October 17, 2025, that a PRN antianxiety medication either be limited to 14 days or have a documented rationale and duration; a nurse signed and documented "14-day added to order" without any physician signature or evidence of physician review. For a third resident with a fracture of the first thoracic vertebra and respiratory failure, the pharmacist recommended on December 10, 2025, additional monitoring for an antipsychotic medication; a nurse signed and documented "AIMS" without a physician signature or documentation that the physician reviewed or acted on the irregularity. In an interview, the DON stated they would expect the regulation to be followed.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙