F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
G

Failure to Administer and Document Medications per Orders and Policy, Resulting in Harm

Letort Spring Nursing And Rehab LlcCarlisle, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 01-29-2026

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide medications in accordance with physician orders, professional standards, and facility policy, resulting in missed doses, inaccurate documentation, and lack of timely physician notification. Facility policy required medications to be administered per written orders, documented immediately on the MAR, and for withheld or refused doses to be coded with explanatory notes, with physician notification if two consecutive doses of a vital medication were missed. Policy also required appropriate ordering, receipt, and use of controlled medications, including timely reordering and use of emergency supplies when appropriate. These standards were not followed for three residents. For one resident with epilepsy and dementia, the physician had ordered lacosamide 100 mg orally every 12 hours. The controlled substance record showed 30 tablets received on December 29 and used beginning January 1, with the last available dose given on January 15 at 8:00 PM. Despite this, the January MAR showed a dose documented as given on the morning of January 16 by an LPN, even though no medication remained; the nurse later stated she had erroneously charted that administration. Subsequent MAR entries for lacosamide on January 16 (PM) and January 17 (AM and PM) were marked as held with notes indicating the drug was on order, on back order, or not available, and progress notes documented repeated calls to the pharmacy. There was no documentation that the physician was notified that four scheduled doses on January 16 and 17 could not be given until after the resident experienced seizure activity late on January 17, which led to transfer to the emergency room. The resident returned without the facility having lacosamide available, experienced another seizure the following morning, and was again sent to the hospital; documentation reflected ongoing uncertainty about when the last doses had actually been administered and that no acute seizure medications were available at the facility at those times. For a second resident with dementia and anxiety disorder, with orders for buspirone every 8 hours, Tylenol Extra Strength three times daily, and Xanax 0.5 mg every 8 hours, the January MAR showed blank entries for the 2:00 PM doses of all three medications on two separate days. On those same days, the controlled substance record showed the 2:00 PM Xanax doses signed out as administered by nursing staff, but there was no corresponding MAR documentation or progress notes explaining whether the medications were given or held. On another date, the MAR showed a 2:00 PM Xanax dose held with a note that it was not needed, while the controlled substance record showed the same dose signed out as administered, creating conflicting documentation. Later in the month, two scheduled Xanax doses were held due to awaiting pharmacy delivery, and progress notes described difficulty obtaining the ordered dose from the emergency supply and the need for a one-time alternative dose order. The controlled substance record for Xanax showed the prescription filled by the pharmacy the day before, but the receipt verification section was left blank, and the first dose from that package was not documented as given until later that day. For a third resident with dementia, hypertension, and cough, physician orders included albuterol nebulizer solution every four hours, geri-tussin syrup every four hours, and Protonix 40 mg in the morning. The November MAR showed blank entries for the 4:00 AM doses of albuterol and geri-tussin and the 6:00 AM dose of Protonix on a specific date, with no corresponding progress notes documenting whether these medications were administered, refused, unavailable, or intentionally held. During interviews, the DON stated she expected staff to administer medications as ordered, reorder medications when down to a five-day supply, follow up with the pharmacy when medications were not delivered, notify physicians promptly when medications were unavailable, and complete all MAR and controlled substance documentation, including receipt verification. The survey findings showed that these expectations and facility policies were not met for the three residents, resulting in missed or undocumented doses, conflicting records, and lack of timely physician notification when ordered medications were not available.

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Resources

Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:

See other F0684 citations
Failure to Monitor Blood Glucose After Rapid Drop
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

A resident with insulin-dependent type 2 DM and mild cognitive impairment had a rapid BG drop after receiving sliding scale insulin. The resident reported fear of overnight hypoglycemia and requested BG checks every 2 hours, but the record did not show overnight monitoring, reassessment, or follow-up. Staff later stated the night nurse was notified, while the resident said BG was not checked again until breakfast.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Provide Ordered Wound Care and Aspiration Precautions
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

Failure to provide ordered wound care and aspiration precautions: A resident returned from a dermatology procedure with biopsy-site dressings and the chart lacked documentation of assessment or wound care, while the dressings remained in place and undated during observations. The same resident also had dysphagia with a FEES showing silent penetration with straw sips and an order for no straws, yet was observed drinking water from a cup with a straw; the SLP and DON confirmed the no-straw precaution and expectation to follow physician orders.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Monitor Ordered Vital Signs
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

Failure to Monitor Ordered Vital Signs: A resident with COPD, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and CHF had a provider order for daily vital signs, but the MAR showed an O2 sat of 87% with no follow-up vitals documented and another day with no vitals documented at all. Nursing notes did not show follow-up monitoring or documentation of the low O2 reading, and the CNO stated vitals were recorded on the night shift but not entered into the record or explained when the day-shift vitals were not completed as ordered.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Medication Administered Despite Hold Parameters
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

Medication Administered Despite Hold Parameters: A resident with HTN and hyperlipidemia had an order for midodrine with BP hold parameters, but licensed nurses administered the medication multiple times even when the resident's BP met or exceeded the ordered limits. MAR review showed doses were given despite systolic and/or diastolic readings at or above the hold threshold, and the NHA acknowledged the medication was administered contrary to the physician's parameters.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Assess and Report Abnormal Blood Glucose and Document Resident Change in Condition
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

Failure to assess and report abnormal blood glucose and document change in condition: The facility did not notify the MD of abnormal CBG results or assess for hypo/hyperglycemia for two residents with DM who had insulin orders and abnormal readings, including low and high values. The record also showed inaccurate documentation for another resident with a bruise of unknown origin that was monitored briefly and then no longer documented.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Notify Provider of Significant Weight Changes
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

A facility failed to notify the provider about a resident’s weight changes per physician order. The resident had CAD, HF, HTN, and dementia, and the record showed weight fluctuations of 4 lbs and 5 lbs, but there was no evidence the provider was updated. The DON confirmed the provider was never notified and stated the provider should have been informed per the order.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation search

Search every citation & Plan of Correction

Go to search
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across Pennsylvania

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in Pennsylvania — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

Trusted data from CMS and state health departments

Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.

In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.

The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.

Get the Survey-Prep Report
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Connection lost — reconnecting… We couldn't reconnect automatically. Please reload the page to continue.