F0695

D

Failure to Follow Respiratory and Tracheostomy Care Orders and Sterile Technique

Belpre, Ohio Survey Completed on 01-30-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide respiratory care as ordered for two residents who required complex airway management. One resident was admitted with sepsis, pneumonia, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and had care plans addressing alterations in respiratory function, dependence on a tracheostomy and ventilator, and the need for oxygen therapy and respiratory treatments. The resident had a physician order dated 01/12/26 for the heat moisture exchange (HME) device to be changed daily and as needed. Review of the treatment administration record (TAR) for January 2026 showed the HME was documented as changed only on 01/12/26, 01/15/26, and 01/21/26, with no additional evidence that the HME was changed daily as ordered.

Further review of respiratory progress notes documented that respiratory therapists performed trach care, oral care, suctioning, inner cannula changes, and HME changes on specific dates, but these entries did not establish that the HME was changed every day as required by the order. The nurse practitioner confirmed that the TAR reflected only as-needed HME replacement and that she was not familiar with HMEs until she researched them and learned they humidify air so the lungs do not get dry. She also stated she did not give orders for tracheostomy or ventilator care and was unsure where those orders originated. The DON acknowledged that the HME order stated it should be changed daily but had been entered into the system as an as-needed order, and reported being told by an RT that HME changes were considered part of standard ventilator care and therefore did not require a separate order.

An RT later explained that HMEs are used for humidification, are good for 24 hours, and are changed every time care is completed, and stated that the HME must have its own separate order because ventilator care documentation alone does not confirm that the HME was changed. This RT described the HME order entry as a clerical error and expressed confidence that daily care was being completed based on his checks of HME dates, but there was no documentation to support daily changes as ordered. The nurse practitioner also identified concerns related to not changing the HME, including pneumonia related to bacteria or aspiration due to increased airway resistance, mucus plugging, hypothermia, pneumonia, and potential respiratory distress.

The second resident was admitted with multiple sclerosis, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, a tracheostomy, ventilator dependence, and a history of ventilator-associated pneumonia and sepsis. The care plan for alteration in respiratory function and tracheostomy/ventilator use included interventions to change the size 6 disposable tracheostomy inner cannula and cleanse the tracheostomy site as ordered. Physician orders directed staff to cleanse the tracheostomy site with sterile water, pat dry, apply a drain sponge, and change every shift and as needed, and to change the size 6 Shiley tracheostomy inner cannula every shift and as needed.

During an observed tracheostomy inner cannula and site care procedure for this resident, the RT donned a gown, performed hand hygiene, and used non-sterile gloves but did not wear a mask. Treatment supplies were placed on a bedside table that also contained personal items, and no barrier or sterile field was used. The RT discarded the sterile gloves from the tracheostomy kit because they were the wrong size, then handled sterile items from the kit with non-sterile gloves, prepared cleaning solutions, and cleansed the tracheostomy stoma using split gauze held with non-sterile gloves. After changing gloves and performing hand hygiene, the RT placed a split gauze around the stoma and then, again using non-sterile gloves, removed the used inner cannula and inserted a new sterile disposable inner cannula before reconnecting the ventilator tubing.

The DON verified that tracheostomy care was supposed to be completed using sterile technique, including sterile gloves, a barrier for supplies, and appropriate personal protective equipment such as a mask. The RT confirmed he did not use a barrier or mask and used non-sterile gloves because the sterile gloves in the kit did not fit, despite acknowledging that sterile gloves were available in the facility. He stated that he performed the procedure using a non-sterile technique and asserted that the facility policy, which required sterile technique at all times for tracheostomy and trach tube care, was wrong. The written policy specified that meticulous tracheostomy care was mandatory to prevent complications, that the tracheostomy stoma should be cleansed regularly using sterile technique at all times, and that the inner cannula should be cleaned regularly using sterile technique at all times, underscoring that the observed practice did not follow the established standard.

This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2702282.