Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Failure to Follow Metoprolol Hold Parameters for Two Residents

Lexington, North Carolina Survey Completed on 01-07-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves nursing staff administering Metoprolol outside of ordered parameters for two residents, contrary to physician orders. Resident #2, admitted with hypertension and severe cognitive impairment, had a physician order for Metoprolol 25 mg once daily with instructions to hold the medication if the heart rate was less than 60 or if the systolic blood pressure was less than 100 or diastolic blood pressure was less than 60. Review of the December 2025 MAR showed that Metoprolol was administered on multiple dates when the resident’s heart rate was below 60: on 12/13 and 12/14 with a heart rate of 52 by one nurse, on 12/16 with a heart rate of 53 by another nurse, on 12/18 with a heart rate of 55 by a third nurse, and on 12/20 with a heart rate of 59 by the same nurse who administered on 12/16. The Medical Director confirmed there were no negative outcomes but stated he expected staff to follow the ordered parameters. The nurses involved, when interviewed, acknowledged that the medication should have been held and characterized the administrations as oversights. Resident #3, admitted with hypertension and cognitively intact per a quarterly MDS, had a physician order for Metoprolol 50 mg three times daily with instructions to hold the medication if the heart rate was less than 60 or if the systolic blood pressure was less than 100 or diastolic blood pressure was less than 60. Review of the January 2026 MAR showed that Metoprolol was administered on 1/2/26 at the 1:00 PM dose and the 9:00 PM dose when the systolic blood pressure was documented as 97, below the ordered hold parameter. The Medical Director again noted no negative outcomes but expected adherence to the parameters. One of the nurses who administered the medication on that date verified the administration outside the ordered parameter and stated it was an oversight. The DON stated she expected nursing staff to follow physician orders, including parameters for holding blood pressure medications.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙