Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate MAR Documentation for Parameter-Dependent Midodrine Administration

Burgaw, North Carolina Survey Completed on 01-15-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain accurate documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for a resident receiving midodrine for hypotension. The physician’s order dated 11/6/25 directed that midodrine 2.5 mg be given twice daily and held if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was over 120 mm/Hg or the diastolic blood pressure was over 80 mm/Hg. The MAR for November, December, and January reflected this order, yet multiple entries showed blood pressure readings above the ordered SBP parameter with the medication still documented as administered. Specific examples included blood pressures of 124/53, 129/54, 132/60, 122/61, 124/62, 134/68, 126/66, and 127/70 mm/Hg, all recorded with midodrine signed out as given. During interviews, the nursing staff and medication aide involved acknowledged that their documentation on the electronic MAR was incorrect. One nurse stated that on 11/15/25 she documented that she administered midodrine when she had not. Another nurse reported that when the resident’s blood pressure was outside the ordered parameters, he held the medication but erroneously documented it as administered on several dates. The medication aide similarly stated that she documented in error that she administered midodrine on two January administrations. The DON stated that her expectation was that medications be administered and documented accurately, and that when a medication is held it should be documented as held with the reason, and acknowledged that the resident’s midodrine was not documented accurately, emphasizing the importance of accurate documentation for evaluation of the resident’s medical condition.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙