Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Prolonged Call Bell Response Times Undermining Resident Dignity

Syracuse, New York Survey Completed on 01-09-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to honor residents’ rights to dignity and timely response to needs, particularly regarding call bell response times. Facility policies stated that residents had a right to a dignified existence and that staff were expected to respond to call bells within 10–15 minutes, with response to resident needs taking priority over routine tasks and being the responsibility of all staff regardless of role or assignment. During a confidential group meeting, all 13 of 13 residents present reported experiencing long call bell response times. Review of the call bell monitor at the nurses’ station showed multiple instances of prolonged unanswered call lights, including one resident’s call bell on for 70 minutes, another resident’s call bell on for 39 minutes, another for 36 minutes, and another for 40 minutes. Further observations and interviews detailed a specific incident involving one resident whose call bell remained on for extended periods while their toileting needs were not promptly met. On one occasion, the call bell monitor showed this resident’s call bell active for 70 minutes before a CNA briefly entered, turned off the call bell, and left, stating the resident wanted their table moved and to get up and that they would inform the assigned aide. The resident later reported believing their light had been on for about an hour and that they needed to use the bathroom. The call bell was reactivated, and a medical secretary subsequently entered, turned off the call bell, and exited without meeting the resident’s stated need, after which the call bell was again turned on until staff eventually assisted the resident to the bathroom. Staff interviews confirmed that all staff were responsible for answering call bells, that expected response times were 5–15 minutes, and that wait times of 30 minutes or more were considered excessive. A clinical coordinator acknowledged having seen long wait times on the call bell monitor in the past and agreed that 40- and 70-minute waits were excessive and that no one should wait that long.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙