F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
D

Failure to Track and Refund Resident Security Deposit After Discharge

Kirkwood Wellness & RehabilitationKirkwood, Missouri Survey Completed on 01-29-2026

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement a process to identify and return refundable resident deposits upon discharge, as required under a prior admission agreement. The previous management’s admission contract, revised on 3/22/23, required a $6,000 interest‑free security deposit to reserve a room, with the deposit to be refunded within 45 days after discharge, less applicable balances. Review of records for one resident showed an application dated 4/2/25 with a documented $6,000 deposit and additional room and board charges due at signing. However, later invoice review showed no documentation of the $6,000 deposit. The current admission agreement under new management did not address the prior $6,000 deposit requirement or how deposits made under the previous management’s contract would be handled. The resident associated with the missing deposit had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including HTN, non‑Alzheimer’s dementia, and asthma, and was discharged to another facility, as documented in progress notes describing coordination with the resident’s daughter and transfer by transportation with a Broda chair and Hoyer pad. Interviews revealed that the Regional Nurse Consultant was unaware of the prior contract’s $6,000 deposit and refund requirement and stated that the new management did not require such deposits, though they were still under the previous management until the change of ownership was completed and were honoring the original contract. The Administrator reported that funds were not turned over during acquisition and that all information had been requested from the previous ownership, but also stated unawareness of the specific deposit while acknowledging that the corporate Business Office Manager knew of it. These findings show that the facility lacked an effective process to track and return refundable deposits owed to discharged residents under the prior agreement.

Penalty

Inspection fine: $172,40057 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Resources

Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:

See other F0568 citations
Failure to Provide Quarterly Resident Trust Fund Statements and Accurately Account for Resident Funds
E
F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
Short Summary

Failure to provide quarterly resident trust fund statements for three residents and to accurately account for one resident's personal funds. Facility records showed active resident fund accounts, but no evidence that quarterly statements were sent to residents or their reps. For one resident, the acct reflected only one month's allowance after a lump-sum payment that covered several months, and the ABOM confirmed the resident fund statement was inaccurate.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Resident Funds Were Not Properly Managed or Accounted For
D
F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
Short Summary

Resident funds were not properly managed or accounted for. A resident with intact cognition, ADL dependence, and monthly SSA income had a resident fund account and patient liability obligations, but the BOM reported using the resident’s bank card to make ATM withdrawals from a shared account, converting the cash to cashier’s checks, and depositing the money into the facility account without written authorization. The BOM could not verify the resident’s monthly allowance or fully track what had been paid toward patient liability, and the facility policy required separate resident accounting, receipts, signatures, and no commingling of funds.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Resident Trust Petty Cash Not Reconciled
E
F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
Short Summary

Resident trust petty cash was not properly safeguarded because cash from other sources was commingled with resident funds and the account did not reconcile to the expected $600 balance. An AA reported that families sometimes gave money for visitor meal tickets at the front desk and that cash from the box was also used for change, while the business office only reconciled the account periodically. The Administrator, DON, and ADON stated resident petty cash should be balanced and kept separate from other money.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Provide Quarterly Resident Financial Statements
D
F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
Short Summary

Failure to provide quarterly resident financial statements: A resident with encephalopathy, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and moderately impaired cognition had Social Security checks deposited into the facility's bank account, but the BO did not inform the resident of the deposits or provide quarterly financial statements. The DON stated the resident's physician should have participated in the financial decision-making process and the resident should have signed an appointment form for management of personal funds.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Provide Quarterly Personal Funds Statements
E
F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
Short Summary

Failure to provide quarterly personal funds statements to designated representatives for several residents with severe cognitive impairment. A resident with dementia, another with Alzheimer’s disease and bipolar disorder, and a third with Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, and CKD had personal funds accounts, but the facility could not show that required statements were sent to the proper contacts. The DSS said statements were supposed to be mailed for cognitively impaired residents, but documentation was missing and one resident’s rep said they never received any statements.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Personal Fund Deposits Not Properly Documented
B
F0568 F568: Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
Short Summary

Personal fund accounting was not properly documented for four residents whose account statements listed $50 and $75 deposits as cash receipts instead of identifying the source of the funds. An R resident also voiced concerns about access to money and knowing what was in the account, and the BOM confirmed the deposits were entered this way and said she was not aware all deposits needed to specify what they were.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation search

Search every citation & Plan of Correction

Go to search
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across Missouri

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in Missouri — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

Trusted data from CMS and state health departments

Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.

In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.

The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.

Get the Survey-Prep Report
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Connection lost — reconnecting… We couldn't reconnect automatically. Please reload the page to continue.