Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
D

Failure to Maintain Hot, Palatable Temperatures for In-Room Meal Service

Jackson, Mississippi Survey Completed on 01-27-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide palatable food at an appetizing and safe temperature to residents receiving in-room meal service. Facility policy titled “Assisting the Resident with In-Room Meals” (revised 2013) directed staff to check that hot foods are hot. Two cognitively intact residents, both with diabetes and hypertension and one with additional acute kidney failure, reported that meals served in their rooms were usually cold or not hot enough to be enjoyable. One resident stated staff told her that her meals were not hot because she was the last served due to her room location, and the other resident reported that her meals were never served hot but that she continued to eat them without replacement or reheating. On a kitchen observation, the cook prepared meals while a dietary aide placed plates on trays and covered them with insulated dome covers but did not use the insulated heat-keeper bases/underliners. Nine of 25 meals had dome covers that did not fully cover the plates, leaving food not completely covered to conserve heat, including the meal for one of the affected residents. Six of 25 plates were covered only by heat-keeper bases instead of dome covers, again including a meal for one of the affected residents. During interviews, the dietary aide and dietary supervisor could not explain why heat-keeper bases were used instead of dome covers for some meals and acknowledged there were not enough heat-keeper bases for all residents receiving in-room meals. The Administrator stated she did not know why insulated bases were not being used and had not been informed of any shortage of insulated components.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙