Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
D

Failure to Follow Metoprolol Hold Parameters Resulting in Medication Errors

Bridgman, Michigan Survey Completed on 01-16-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors related to administration of metoprolol succinate ER. The resident, a female with bipolar disorder, dementia, and delusional disorder, had a physician’s order for metoprolol succinate ER 25 mg by mouth once daily for hypertension, with instructions to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or the pulse was less than 60, and to notify the physician. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) for October, November, and December 2025 showed multiple instances where the resident’s systolic blood pressure was documented below 110, yet the metoprolol was still administered on those dates. Specific blood pressure readings below the ordered parameter included systolic values of 107, 102, 106, 107, 94, and 107 in October; 103, 106, 100, 100, 108, 105, and 109 in November; and 103, 104, 104, 106, 109, and 104 in December, all with documentation that the medication was given. The resident’s medical record contained no documentation that any provider was notified when blood pressure readings were outside the ordered parameters. In interviews, an LPN stated that medications with hold parameters should not be given if vital signs are outside those parameters. The physician assistant and nurse practitioner both reported that, based on the written order, the metoprolol should have been held whenever the systolic blood pressure was below 110, and the nurse practitioner did not recall being notified of any holds. The DON stated her expectation that medications be given per physician orders and acknowledged that if the provider was not contacted and the medication was given when blood pressure was outside parameters, it constituted a medication error.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙