Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0551
D

Failure to Honor Resident Representative’s Discharge Wishes

Rockville, Maryland Survey Completed on 01-14-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to honor the wishes of a resident’s representative regarding discharge, despite the resident being determined unable to comprehend information and make decisions. The resident had been admitted from the hospital for rehabilitation, and two physician certifications documented the resident’s incapacity on two separate dates. A social services note recorded that the resident’s representative wanted the resident discharged earlier than the date set by the Director of Rehabilitation so the resident could be home, and the representative planned to follow up with Social Services about a discharge date. Subsequently, when the representative arranged transportation home and notified the facility, Social Services staff (Staff #6) informed the representative that discharge paperwork, including an Against Medical Advice (AMA) form, had to be signed and returned before the resident could leave on the requested date. Staff #6 acknowledged telling the representative that, because the resident could not sign, the representative needed to sign the AMA form for the resident to be discharged. The AMA form, later provided to the surveyor, contained a written statement by the representative that the facility had said the resident would not be allowed to leave unless the form was signed, and it was signed by both the representative and Staff #6. An email from Staff #6 to the representative stated that the facility could send discharge paperwork in advance but required the signed paperwork to discharge the resident on the requested day. The representative reported believing the facility could not hold the resident if the representative wanted the resident to go home, but signed and returned the AMA form after being told the resident could not be discharged without it. The corporate nurse later confirmed she had informed Staff #6 that the AMA form was not required, but this occurred after the representative had already signed the document.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙