Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Incomplete Capacity Certifications and Inaccurate Pain and Injury Documentation

Forestville, Maryland Survey Completed on 01-12-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for two residents. For one resident, review of the medical record showed two “Physician’s Certifications Related to Medical Condition, Decision Making, and Treatment Limitations” forms. Although both forms were signed and dated, the section titled “Certification Regarding Decision Making Capacity” was left blank on each form. The provider did not check either box to indicate whether the resident had adequate decision-making capacity or lacked adequate decision-making capacity, including for life-sustaining treatments. During an interview and dual review of the forms, the Regional Director of Clinical Services confirmed that the forms were not completed and acknowledged that it was the facility’s expectation that the physician check one of the boxes. The date on one form, completed by the Medical Director, was also illegible and not easy to decipher. For the second resident, the deficiency centers on inaccurate and inconsistent documentation related to an injury and pain assessment. A facility-reported incident described a GNA calling the assigned nurse to the resident’s room for a laceration to the right pinky finger with bright red blood and swelling. However, a progress note by a physician assistant from a video visit documented the resident as presenting with a laceration to the left leg with bone exposure and active bleeding, and further described the left fifth digit with bone exposure at the base. The resident had a history of vascular dementia and was a poor historian due to cognitive impairment. Review of a Pain Observation Tool for the same date showed that an RN documented “No” to the question asking whether the resident verbalized and/or exhibited non-verbal symptoms of pain, despite the physician assistant’s note stating the resident was experiencing pain and the wound was actively bleeding. Additional review of the Pain Observation Tool revealed further inaccuracies in medication documentation. In the section on pain relief, the RN documented that the resident received scheduled pain medication (“Yes”) and did not receive PRN pain medication (“No”). A dual review of the December medication administration record showed the resident did not have an order for scheduled pain medication but did have an order for PRN acetaminophen 325 mg, two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for pain or fever, with a maximum daily dose specified. The DON confirmed that this documentation was not accurate. The DON also stated that the resident only had a laceration to the right pinky finger, and a hospital discharge summary verified that the resident was seen for a laceration to the right pinky, further demonstrating discrepancies between the medical record entries and the resident’s actual condition.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙