Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Care-Planned Fall-Prevention Interventions

Lisbon, Iowa Survey Completed on 01-21-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement established fall-prevention interventions for a resident assessed as at risk for falls. The resident had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15/15 and diagnoses including fracture with multiple trauma, CVA, muscle wasting and atrophy, Type 2 DM, CKD, history of TIA, and a history of fall with left hip fracture and repair. The care plan, revised on multiple dates, identified that the resident required supervision or touching assistance with transfers and walking, assistance of one staff member for transfers and ambulation to and from the bathroom using a wheeled walker and gait belt, and specific fall-prevention interventions. These interventions included not leaving the resident unattended in a wheelchair in the room, assisting with ambulation and transfers as needed, and having a sign in the room instructing use of the call light. Despite these care-planned interventions, observations on several dates showed the resident propelling herself in a wheelchair from the dining room to her room, entering and using the bathroom independently, and transferring herself from the wheelchair to a recliner without staff assistance. On one occasion, the resident was observed ambulating independently from the bathroom while pushing the wheelchair backwards with a stooped posture before sitting in a recliner. The resident had a documented unwitnessed fall in her room after self-ambulating to get a blanket without using the call light, stating she thought she could do it herself. A sign instructing staff not to leave the resident unattended in a wheelchair in the room was present, and staff interviewed acknowledged that the resident required one-person assistance with a walker and gait belt and that interventions included not leaving her unattended in the wheelchair in her room. The facility’s fall policy required that, based on assessment, interventions be implemented and placed on the care plan, but the observed practices did not align with the care-planned interventions for this resident.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙