Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Document Incident Involving Elopement-Risk Resident

Story City, Iowa Survey Completed on 01-15-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to document an incident in which a resident left the facility unattended and later returned with staff. The resident had a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition, and diagnoses including hypertension, Alzheimer’s disease, non-Alzheimer’s dementia, cataracts, glaucoma, and macular degeneration. The MDS documented that the resident could understand and be understood, had no documented behaviors such as wandering or rejecting care, and was independent with personal hygiene and ambulation using a 4-wheeled walker. The care plan, however, identified the resident as an elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness, noted that the resident wore a wander alert pendant, and was independent with mobility. Facility records showed conflicting information about the resident’s assigned household, with the Wanderguard list indicating the Life Bridges household and a resident list report indicating a different household. The DON and ADON explained that the resident lived in the Life Bridges household and had gone out the north door of the facility, where the resident was usually supervised when outside. The DON stated that because the resident did not “actually elope,” the facility decided it was not necessary to document the incident in the clinical record. Upon later review, the DON acknowledged that staff are expected to document any incidents or unusual occurrences in the clinical record for all residents. The facility’s Nurse Competency Check Off List, reviewed on 6/24/24, required documentation of follow-up notes, family communication, hot charting, changes in condition, behaviors, new skin issues, unusual events, and alleged abuse, indicating that documentation of such incidents was an expected standard that was not followed in this case.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙