Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Complete Timely Post-Readmission Skin Assessment

Pleasant Hill, Iowa Survey Completed on 01-07-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to perform timely and complete skin assessments following a resident’s readmission from the hospital, despite existing policies and care plan directives. The resident had diagnoses including sepsis, weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care, and was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15/15. The facility’s pressure ulcer/skin breakdown policy required nursing staff to examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of pressure ulcers or other skin conditions, and the resident’s care plan directed staff to monitor and document the location, size, and treatment of skin injuries and to report abnormalities. Prior to hospitalization, the care plan documented moisture-associated skin damage to the buttocks. Nurses’ notes showed the resident was sent to the hospital for sepsis and later readmitted. On the day of readmission, the resident refused a full skin check because he wanted to remain in his chair for dinner. The record lacked documentation that staff reapproached the resident for a skin check, including assessment of the buttocks, between the date of readmission and several days later. A subsequent skin issues note documented a new buttocks wound with specific measurements and a pink/red wound bed. The Wound Nurse stated that the nurse completing admissions was responsible for head-to-toe skin assessments and acknowledged there was likely an assumption that the admitting nurse had completed the assessment, which contributed to the lack of follow-up. The DON stated that staff should perform skin assessments on the day of admission and, if not done, this should be communicated to subsequent shifts and reattempted if initially refused, which did not occur in this case.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙