Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Protect Resident From Verbal Abuse and Timely Report Allegation

Summitville, Indiana Survey Completed on 01-14-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure staff intervened to protect a resident from verbal abuse by a staff member and to report the allegation of abuse in a timely manner to facility leadership and regulatory agencies. Resident B, who had vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety, a prior cerebral infarction, moderate cognitive impairment, and left-sided functional impairment, required extensive assistance with ADLs and had care plans addressing impaired cognition and a history of being verbally abusive with staff. These care plans included maintaining consistent routines and caregivers and encouraging the resident to participate in care to the fullest extent possible. There was no care plan or assignment sheet indication that the resident was restricted from using the showerhead. On the date of the incident, CNA 1 and QMA 2 were providing a shower to Resident B when CNA 1 moved the resident into the corner of the shower away from the showerhead and refused to allow the resident to use it, stating staff had been told the resident could not have the showerhead. QMA 2 reported she had never been told this. During the shower, CNA 1 threw a washcloth at the resident and told him to wash his “junk,” and engaged in a tug-of-war over the showerhead, ultimately jerking it away from the resident. Resident B corroborated this account, stating that CNA 1 jerked the showerhead away, dumped shampoo on his head instead of into his hand, threw a washcloth at him, and would not allow him to do what he could for himself, unlike other caregivers. The resident reported being upset by the interaction, used profanity to describe the situation, and identified CNA 1 as a staff member who was not nice and would not give him the showerhead. Despite witnessing this encounter and considering it abusive, QMA 2 did not intervene to stop CNA 1 or remove her from the situation and did not immediately report the suspected abuse to the Administrator or DON as required by facility policy. QMA 2 later stated she did not feel the incident needed to be reported because the resident was not harmed or in distress and that her focus was on avoiding further conflict while continuing care. The incident occurred during the 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. shift, but was not reported by QMA 2 until the following day, resulting in delayed notification to the Administrator and delayed reporting to regulatory agencies. Additional staff interviews revealed that other CNAs were unaware of any restriction on the resident’s use of the showerhead, that the resident was generally allowed to use it and participate in his own care, and that CNA 1 had previously been “not nice” to the resident, but those concerns had not been reported. Facility leadership confirmed that staff were expected to protect residents first and immediately report suspected or actual abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, and that Resident B was allowed to have the showerhead.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙