Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0770
D

Failure to Ensure Timely and Valid Urine Laboratory Testing

Dyer, Indiana Survey Completed on 01-13-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure timely and valid laboratory services for urinalysis (UA) and urine culture and sensitivity testing for a resident with significant urinary and renal conditions. The resident had diagnoses including stage 3 chronic kidney disease, a history of UTIs, and a left nephrostomy catheter, with a care plan directing monitoring for UTI signs and symptoms. A nurse’s note documented that a urine sample was collected for testing, and lab records showed a UA with culture and sensitivity was collected on 12/10/25. However, the results were not reported until 11 days later and were marked invalid. A subsequent nurse practitioner note documented the nephrostomy tube status and included an order for another UA with culture and sensitivity. A nurse’s note later indicated another urine sample was collected on 12/26/25, and lab records showed the UA with culture and sensitivity was reported five days after collection, with the specimen rejected due to urine stability lapsing, rendering the results invalid. A physician’s order dated 1/9/26 directed that another UA be completed, but no results for this test were found in the resident’s record. During interview, the Corporate RN Consultant stated that the delay in results from the 12/10/25 UA had only come to their attention on 1/13/26, acknowledged that the 12/26/25 UA had not been completed, and confirmed there was no facility policy addressing timeliness of lab results. The lab company reported having no results yet for the UA ordered on 1/9/26.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙