F0689

G

Failure to Communicate High Fall Risk and Implement Fall Prevention During ADL Care

Palos Heights, Illinois Survey Completed on 01-04-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident at high risk for falls was free from accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistive devices during care. The resident is an alert and oriented, predominantly Polish‑speaking older adult with multiple comorbidities including type II diabetes, COPD, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, anxiety disorder, history of falls, and prior humeral fracture. The resident’s care plan, dated 5/12/25, identified her as at high risk for falls due to history of falls, impaired mobility, weakness, and multiple comorbidities, with interventions including keeping the bed in a low position, encouraging slow transfers and position changes, frequent toileting, having commonly used items within reach, and use of a low bed. Despite this, on observation on 1/2/26, the resident was seen in bed with the bed raised to waist height and no fall mats or other fall prevention measures in place.

On the date of the fall, an agency CNA provided ADL care to the resident for the first time without being oriented to the resident’s high fall risk status or specific care needs. According to the facility’s incident report, the CNA had the resident lying on her left side, with one hand on the resident’s rib cage to stabilize her while washing with the other hand, when the resident began to roll out of bed; the CNA attempted but failed to stop the fall. The resident consistently reported in interviews, including through a Polish‑speaking surveyor and in a post‑fall statement interpreted by a staff member, that the CNA let go of her while changing her, that there were no side rails in place, and that she then rolled out of the bed and fell. The resident denied reaching for any object or preferring to be at the edge of the bed or using the nightstand for support, and the care plan contained no documentation of such preferences, contradicting the facility’s later assertion that the resident’s own positioning preferences contributed to the fall.

Staff interviews further demonstrated a lack of communication and understanding of the resident’s fall risk status and fall prevention measures. The agency CNA stated that no one told her anything about the resident’s history or that she was a high fall risk, that it was her first time caring for the resident, and that she did not recall receiving fall prevention training at the facility. She also confirmed there were no bed rails in place and that she did not understand the resident because the resident did not speak English. The LPN on duty at the time of the incident reported finding the resident on the floor with active head bleeding and stated that the CNA told her the resident fell when she was turned too far during cleaning; the LPN did not recall any side rails being present and stated that if there had been side rails, the resident might not have rolled out of bed. This LPN also stated she did not consider the resident a fall risk and had never been told the resident was high risk for falls. An agency LPN caring for the resident later also stated she did not consider the resident a fall risk and could not describe facility fall prevention measures, indicating she relied on agency training. When surveyors requested a fall prevention policy, the administrator provided only a Fall Occurrence policy focused on assessment and care planning after falls, and confirmed that was the only policy, indicating the absence of a documented fall prevention policy and procedure for communicating fall risk and interventions to staff.

The fall resulted in the resident sustaining a displaced fracture of the right humerus, a head laceration above the right eye with active bleeding requiring Steri‑Strips, facial contusions, and a hematoma and bruising of the right eye and right side of the face, as confirmed by hospital records and NP documentation. The resident reported ongoing pain in both shoulders and difficulty holding objects after the fall. The facility’s investigation notes and staff statements attempted to attribute the fall to the resident’s actions or preferences, but these claims were not supported by the care plan, resident interviews, or contemporaneous staff accounts. Overall, the deficiency centers on the facility’s failure to orient agency staff to the resident’s high fall risk, failure to implement and communicate care‑planned fall prevention interventions (including bed position and assistive devices such as side rails), and failure to maintain an environment free from accident hazards, which directly preceded the resident’s fall and injuries.