Failure to Maintain Safe Indoor Temperatures and Monitor Residents During Heating System Malfunction
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain safe and comfortable indoor temperatures for all 102 residents following a power outage and subsequent heating system malfunction. After a power outage occurred on a Saturday, the Maintenance Director reported that the power was restored within approximately 45 minutes and stated there were no heating issues at that time. The next day, the Administrator notified the Maintenance Director that the heat was not working, and the Maintenance Director manually reset the boiler system, which he stated was required after the outage but had not been done earlier because he was unaware of the need. He reported that after resetting the boilers, the heat began working and temperatures taken throughout the facility showed it was warming up, and he then left the building. Despite this, residents and staff reported that the building remained cold over the weekend and into Monday. One resident stated that heating issues began on Saturday evening when the power went out and that the thermostat in his room read 55–60°F for 18 hours before he was moved to another room on Sunday afternoon. Another resident reported that it was very cold and that his nose was freezing to the touch, and staff provided extra blankets. A third resident’s room temperature was measured at 62.4°F by the Assistant Maintenance staff, and this resident reported that his room had been cold for two to three days, had already had his roommate moved out, and had asked his son to bring winter gloves. Another resident reported that his room was freezing the previous night, that he had 10 blankets on to stay warm, and that multiple people attempted but were unable to fix the heater in his room. A fifth resident reported that the heat was not working, that he used four blankets and two pairs of pants to stay warm, and that he remained in his room during this time. Staff interviews and facility records further demonstrated that the facility did not adequately monitor or respond to the cold conditions. A CNA reported working a morning shift when the building was cold, wearing her winter jacket while assisting residents in the dining room, and hearing residents complain of the cold; she stated that residents were moved to warmer areas but that she did not obtain temperatures on any residents. An LPN working a 12-hour day shift stated the facility was cold when she arrived and that she only took body temperatures on residents who could not verbalize if they were cold. An RN working the night shift reported that the facility felt cold when she arrived, that the previous shift had told her it was getting colder throughout the day, and that she instructed CNAs to add clothing and blankets and repositioned a resident’s bed away from a window, but she did not call anyone about the cold. Another LPN working night shifts over three days stated that heating issues started Saturday night, that staff were told maintenance had done everything possible, and that although it was cold on subsequent nights, she did not notify anyone on Sunday night. Temperature logs for the day of January 19 showed multiple readings below typical comfort levels, with recorded temperatures ranging from as low as 57.8°F to 71.4°F at various times between 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM. The Maintenance Director stated he was not notified by staff or administration on Sunday night into Monday morning that the heat was not working properly and that he did not become aware of the ongoing heating problem until he arrived Monday morning. The Assistant DON, who was the on-call nursing manager Sunday night, reported receiving no calls about the heat not working, and the Administrator similarly reported receiving no calls about the cold conditions that night, while stating that staff should have notified him or the Maintenance Director. The DON stated that staff began taking resident temperatures on Monday evening and acknowledged that not all residents’ temperatures were checked and that all residents should have been monitored, including on Sunday night if staff felt the facility was cold. The facility’s written policy on “Loss of Heat During Cold Weather” required that staff be oriented and educated to procedures for individual room heat malfunction and loss of heat to the entire facility. For individual room malfunctions, the policy directed staff to notify maintenance and to check room temperatures as needed, sampling at least every two hours when residents were in the room, and recommended moving residents if room temperatures fell below 55°F for 12 hours or more. For loss of heat to the facility, the policy required notification of the Administrator and Maintenance Department and observation of residents for signs of adverse effects of cooler temperatures. The report indicates that the facility did not document monitoring of all residents for signs and symptoms of hypothermia, including temperature checks, during the period when the facility lacked adequate heat on Sunday night and Monday, and that staff did not consistently follow the notification and monitoring procedures outlined in the policy.
