Failure to Address Repeated Grievances About Language Barriers and Ineffective Communication
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide staff with adequate training and effective processes to address language barriers that had been repeatedly reported through grievances and resident council meetings. A cognitively intact resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 reported that language remained a significant barrier and that the resident council had been discussing this issue for months without resolution. This resident stated that staff would push their phones toward residents and attempt to use translator applications for communication, which the resident refused, believing they should be able to communicate with staff directly without a translator. The resident also reported hearing staff speak Spanish while caring for other residents who only spoke English. Review of grievance records showed multiple complaints over several months related to staff not speaking or understanding English and staff speaking Spanish in front of non‑Spanish‑speaking residents, particularly on one unit. One grievance described a CNA who could not answer a resident’s question because she could not speak English and did not understand what the resident was asking, with no resolution documented. Another grievance from a resident and family member reported difficulty communicating with a specific care staff member due to a language barrier and poor response time; the only documented action was that the employee was counseled, with no follow‑up recorded. Resident council grievances repeatedly documented that CNAs on a particular station did not speak or knew very little English, that residents felt uncomfortable with staff using phones to translate, and that staff spoke Spanish to each other during mealtimes in front of English‑speaking residents. These items were repeatedly marked as “Not Resolved – Action Needed,” and residents noted that prior nursing grievances had not been resolved and that they wanted action taken. Surveyor interviews further demonstrated ongoing communication problems and lack of effective staff training. An attempted interview with a CNA could not be completed because the CNA did not understand questions asked in English, evidencing a direct language barrier between staff and surveyors. A unit manager LPN stated that communication with staff on one unit was easier for her because she could use “Spanglish,” and acknowledged that CNAs on that unit had difficulty understanding clinical questions unless speech was slow and clear; she also confirmed that resident council repeatedly raised concerns about staff speaking Spanish in the hallways and that staff used translator applications on their phones to communicate with residents and English‑speaking staff. The Social Services Director acknowledged grievances related to language barriers and stated that staff had only been given verbal reminders not to speak other languages while caring for residents, which had not been effective. The Social Worker reported a potential issue with Spanish‑speaking staff and residents, stated that staff were not allowed to use translators to communicate with residents, and that being able to communicate and read English was a requirement for staff, but also stated that resolutions to grievances were not specifically documented. The Regional Director of Operations stated that the facility needed to go beyond verbal communication to resolve a repeating issue and that more should have been done to provide staff with resources and residents with communication in a language they understand, while facility policies required culturally competent care, effective communication in a language residents can understand, and sufficient guidance and training for staff on communication, which were not effectively implemented.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Grievance Information Not Posted or Accessible: The facility failed to provide 7 confidential residents with accessible information on how to file grievances or concerns. During Resident Council, residents stated they did not know they could file grievances anonymously and had not seen the grievance procedure posted in prominent locations. Surveyors observed the lobby postings did not include the grievance policy, filing instructions, or where to obtain a form, while the ADM stated forms were available near the staff break room and could be submitted anonymously in the same box as blank forms.
A facility failed to ensure grievance forms available at one of the grievance information locations included wording that a grievance could be filed anonymously. Although the grievance policy stated complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously, the policy/procedure was not posted at the Willow Unit location, and the grievance forms there did not mention anonymous filing. The NHA confirmed the omission.
Failure to Resolve Representative’s Grievance About Morphine Use: A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, severe cognitive impairment, a pressure ulcer, and hospice services had a care plan meeting where her RP said morphine made her sedated and confused, asked that he be notified before any MS was given, and requested routine acetaminophen instead. The request was not entered as a grievance, was not documented in the resident’s record, and staff later gave MS without notifying the RP. Interviews showed the MDS Coordinator and DON did not follow up on the complaint, and the grievance log had no entry for the resident.
Delayed Follow-Up on Missing Dentures: A resident with Alzheimer’s disease and severe cognitive impairment was observed eating without teeth after missing dentures were not followed up on timely. The SSD was first notified by family that the dentures were missing, but did not pursue the issue with the dental consultant for more than a month. The resident’s SLP noted the resident took longer to chew food because the resident did not have teeth.
Failure to File and Investigate Resident Grievance: A resident reported that a CNA made a false statement after he helped his roommate following a fall, but the concern was not filed as a grievance or investigated. The grievance log only showed an unrelated grievance about inconsistent care, and the SS Director stated she did not complete a grievance because that was not how grievances worked; the ADON and DON stated the grievance should have been filed and investigated.
A resident’s family grievance about staff not waking the resident and getting him out of bed was not documented or investigated, despite the administrator speaking with the family member. In a separate issue, a cognitively intact resident reported that clothing packed during an evacuation was missing after return to the facility, and the missing items were not satisfactorily resolved; staff searched for the bag, but it was not found and the administrator acknowledged the facility was responsible for the clothing.
Grievance Information Not Posted or Accessible
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide information to residents and their representatives about how to file grievances or concerns for 7 of 15 confidential residents. During Resident Council on 08/12/2026 at 11:00am, 7 confidential residents stated they did not know they could file a grievance anonymously and had not seen a posting of the grievance procedure in prominent locations. The residents attending the council stated there was no system for submitting a grievance anonymously, and all 7 residents had lived in the facility for more than 6 months. On 08/12/2026 at 1:45pm, surveyors observed the prominent postings in the lobby area and found no grievance policy, no instructions for filing a grievance, and no directions for where a grievance form was available. On 08/13/2026 at 11:30am, the ADM stated she was the grievance officer, that grievance forms were available down a hallway by the staff break room, and that residents could anonymously leave completed forms in the same box as the empty forms. The ADM also stated grievances were assigned to department heads, were intended to be resolved within 5 days, and were documented on the original grievance form, which was kept in a notebook for 3 years. The facility's grievance policy, revised January 2017, stated residents and representatives could file grievances orally, in writing, or anonymously, and that a copy of the grievance/complaint procedure was to be posted on the resident bulletin board.
Grievance Information Missing Anonymous Filing Option
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that grievance forms could be filed anonymously in one of four locations where grievance information was available, specifically on the Willow Unit. The facility policy on grievances, last reviewed 3/1/26, stated that grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously. However, during an observation on 8/4/26 at 8:04 a.m., the grievance policy/procedure was not posted at the location on the [NAME] Unit, and the grievance forms available at the grievance box location did not include wording stating that a grievance form can be filed anonymously. During an interview on 8/6/26 at 3:30 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility grievance policy and procedure failed to provide information on residents' right to file a grievance anonymously.
Failure to Resolve Representative’s Grievance About Morphine Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve a grievance voiced by a resident’s representative during a care plan meeting. The resident was a 92-year-old female with Alzheimer’s disease, anemia, a pressure ulcer of the right heel, severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 3, and hospice services. Her care plan addressed chronic pain and included analgesia as ordered, with evaluation of pain interventions each shift and as needed. Her physician orders included acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 hours as needed and morphine sulfate 15 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain. During the care plan conference, the resident’s representative stated that narcotic medication caused the resident to become sedated and confused, requested that morphine sulfate not be given unless he was first notified, and asked to add routine acetaminophen to help with repositioning and reduce the need for morphine. The conference note reflected that hospice would be contacted for orders. However, the resident’s record did not contain documentation that the representative’s request to be notified before morphine administration was entered into the medical record, and the facility grievance log for that month had no entry for the resident. The resident later received morphine sulfate once, and the medical record did not show that the representative was notified before administration. Staff interviews showed the RN was unaware of any instruction to call the family before giving morphine, the MDS Coordinator stated the representative’s complaints during the care plan meeting should have been translated into a grievance and followed up on but were not, and the DON stated she did not follow up on the complaints voiced during the meeting. The facility grievance policy stated that residents have the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and that the facility must make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Delayed Follow-Up on Missing Dentures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that one resident’s missing dentures were followed up with the dental consultant in a timely manner. The resident had Alzheimer’s disease with late onset, lacked the capacity to understand and make decisions, and had severe cognitive impairment on the MDS dated 7/2/2026. The resident also required substantial to maximal assistance with ADLs, including bathing, dressing, rolling, and transferring. On 7/23/2026, the resident was observed eating in the dining room without teeth. The speech therapy evaluation dated 6/29/2026 indicated that because the resident did not have teeth, the resident took longer to chew food. The social services director stated she was first made aware by the resident’s family member on 6/16/2026 that the dentures were missing, but did not follow up on the dentures until 7/23/2026, more than one month later. The resident had a dental evaluation on 6/23/2026, but it did not indicate whether the resident was seen for dentures. The social services director stated the delay was not acceptable and that the denture referral was not followed up timely.
Failure to File and Investigate Resident Grievance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s concern about a CNA’s false statement was treated as a grievance and investigated for one of three reviewed residents. Resident #8 stated that after he assisted his roommate following a fall, a CNA later said he had not helped her, and he reported this concern to the Social Services Director. The resident said no one investigated his allegation, and after he spoke with Social Services, he was asked whether he wanted to transfer because he was unhappy with the facility. He stated that he did not want to transfer and wanted to remain at the facility. Review of the grievance log showed a grievance filed by Resident #8 on 4/8/2026 concerning inconsistent care, but there was no grievance related to the staff member’s false statement. The Social Services Director stated she was not aware of any grievance other than the April grievance and said she did not fill out a grievance because that is not how grievances work. The ADON stated she did not know why a grievance was not filed and that it should have been. The DON stated that a grievance should have been filed, investigated, and followed up in writing.
Failure to Document Grievance and Resolve Missing Clothing Complaint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident’s grievance was documented and promptly investigated after the resident’s responsible party called to complain that staff were not waking the resident and getting him out of bed. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting his left non-dominant side, polyneuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, insomnia, pain, and peripheral vascular disease. The responsible party stated she called the facility and spoke with a nurse about the concern, and later spoke with the administrator about the same issue. Interviews with the DON and SSD confirmed there was no documentation of the complaint. The administrator confirmed he spoke with the responsible party after her call, but he did not document the grievance and the facility did not investigate it. The facility’s grievance policy stated grievances were to be documented and thoroughly investigated, with prompt efforts to resolve them. The facility also failed to satisfactorily resolve a grievance involving a resident’s missing clothing after evacuation to a sister facility. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, spinal stenosis, and chronic pain, reported that a bag containing three days of clothing was missing after she returned to the facility. She stated the missing clothing included items she needed and preferred to wear, and that she remained without those clothes for about a month after returning. The grievance record showed staff checked the laundry room, spoke with housekeeping, and searched other closets, but the bag and clothing were not found. Interviews confirmed the clothing had been packed for evacuation, was not returned with the resident, and may have been left at the sister facility or lost in transfer. The administrator acknowledged it was the facility’s responsibility to ensure the clothing was packed and returned, and stated he should have replaced the resident’s clothing.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.