Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0711
E

Failure to Obtain Timely Practitioner Signatures on Monthly Orders

Hartford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 01-05-2026

Penalty

Fine: $32,295
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that practitioners reviewed, signed, and dated physician orders at each required visit in accordance with Connecticut General Statute 19-13-D8t. For one resident with dementia and bipolar disorder who had severely impaired cognition and was receiving routine antipsychotic medication, the care plan identified risk for complications related to psychotropic drugs and included interventions such as gradual dose reduction and monitoring for side effects. However, review of provider orders showed that monthly orders were last signed by an APRN in mid-June, with no signed orders identified for July, August, November, or December. Another resident with dementia and hypertension, also with severely impaired cognition and receiving routine antipsychotics, had a care plan directing that medications be administered as ordered, but provider orders were only signed in mid-October, with no signed orders identified for November or December. A third resident with type II diabetes and schizophrenia, with moderately impaired cognition, was receiving routine antipsychotics and insulin injections, and had a care plan directing that medications be administered as ordered by the physician. For this resident, monthly orders were last signed in late September, with no signed orders identified for October, November, or December. A fourth resident with schizophrenia and hyperlipidemia, with moderately impaired cognition and receiving routine antipsychotics, had a care plan that included explaining the importance and risks of taking or not taking medications, but provider orders were only signed in late September, with no signed orders identified for October, November, or December. In an interview, the DNS stated that monthly orders are reviewed and signed in the medical records, that practitioners or the physician can sign off on resident orders, and that there was no facility policy for timeliness of signing orders, with the facility following a practice of signing orders every 60 days per the Connecticut Public Health Code.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙