Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
E

Improper Documentation of Ordering Physician for Telephone and Medical Orders

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 01-12-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff entered telephone and other medical orders under the attending physician’s name rather than under the actual prescriber’s name, contrary to accepted standards and the facility’s own policy. During interview, one physician (MD1) reported that when telephone orders were given by members of her medical team (MDs, NPs), facility staff would document the orders using her name as the ordering physician. MD1 stated she had been informed that the facility’s electronic medical record system did not include the names of the other medical team members as options for the ordering provider. Another physician (MD2) confirmed that the computer program used for order entry only allowed selection of the attending physician’s name and did not allow the ordering MD to enter orders under their own name, making it difficult to identify which covering MD actually gave the order. Review of the facility’s Pharmaceutical Services Policy and Procedure Manual, dated 1/2025, showed that medication telephone orders were required to be countersigned by the prescriber. This practice resulted in difficulty identifying the ordering physician’s name in the medical record and had the potential to mislead the healthcare system and create potential for fraud, as documented by the surveyors.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙