Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0755
E

Failure to Follow Antihypertensive Hold Parameters

Sylmar, California Survey Completed on 01-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow physician orders for holding antihypertensive medications for one resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including an unspecified thoracic vertebra wedge compression fracture, essential hypertension, and generalized muscle weakness. The physician’s orders, dated 12/3/2025, directed that atenolol 50 mg by mouth daily be held if systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 mmHg or pulse was less than 60 bpm, and that losartan 100 mg by mouth daily be held if SBP was less than 110 mmHg. The resident’s History and Physical indicated the resident had capacity to understand and make decisions, while the MDS dated 12/5/2025 documented severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decisions and dependence on staff for toileting, showering, and dressing. Review of the Medication Administration Record for 12/2025 showed that LVN 1 documented administration of atenolol and losartan on multiple dates when the resident’s SBP was below the 110 mmHg hold parameter. Specifically, atenolol and losartan were documented as given on 12/25/2025 at 9 a.m. with a BP of 109/70 mmHg, losartan was documented as given on 12/26/2025 at 9 a.m. with BP 108/72 mmHg, on 12/27/2025 at 9 a.m. with BP 106/68 mmHg, and on 12/28/2025 at 9 a.m. with BP 109/70 mmHg, and atenolol again on 12/28/2025 at 9 a.m. with BP 109/72 mmHg. During interview, LVN 1 stated that a check mark on the MAR indicated the medication was administered and claimed he had actually held the atenolol and losartan on those dates and times but could not prove this. RN 1 and the DON both stated that LVN 1 should have followed the physician’s orders and held the medications when SBP was below 110 mmHg, and the facility’s medication administration policy required medications to be administered as prescribed, including verification of vital signs when necessary.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙