Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Implement Effective Discharge Planning Leading to Post-Discharge Instability

Oakland, California Survey Completed on 01-23-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for a resident with multiple cognitive and physical impairments. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, a history of traumatic brain injury, ataxia, and repeated falls, and had a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The facility’s own policy required that discharge planning begin upon admission, with an initial discharge assessment within seven days and a discharge care plan developed by Social Services with the IDT. However, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the clinical record contained no evidence of discharge planning prior to the actual discharge date and no discharge care plan was developed. An IDT note documented that a family member had contacted the facility about discharge plans and was working on financial benefits, but there was no further documentation of coordination or follow-up with the family member regarding these plans. On the day of discharge, the resident was sent in an Uber to an assisted living facility with medications and a medication list documented as provided to the subsequent provider, but not to the resident. The Discharge Planning Review Form was completed and signed the day after discharge and lacked the resident’s or family member’s signature. Following discharge, a home health RN reported that when she assessed the resident for home health admission, the resident did not have a medication list or discharge medications, requiring the home health office to contact the facility for this information. Staff at the assisted living reported that the resident claimed to self-administer medications but did not show which medications, ambulated without a walker in an unusual manner, and frequently wandered off to an unknown shelter. The assisted living owner reported that the resident occasionally left the home, sometimes becoming dirty after being homeless for a few days, and that although the resident received financial benefits, they did not know who the payee was or who was receiving the money.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙