Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Inaccurate Pressure Ulcer Measurement and Documentation for Two Residents

Granada Hills, California Survey Completed on 01-16-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately measure and document pressure ulcer/injury (PU/I) wound dimensions for two residents, relying instead on automatically generated measurements from a photo device. One resident was admitted with an unstageable pressure ulcer on the sacrococcyx and diagnoses including osteomyelitis, spina bifida, and abnormal posture. An early progress note documented the sacrococcyx wound as 7.66 cm in length, 10.87 cm in width, 0 cm in depth, and 67.66 sq. cm in area, based on a photo taken by the treatment nurse. However, a subsequent surgical consult described the same wound, now characterized as a stage IV PU/I extending to bilateral buttocks, as 11.5 cm in length, 15.0 cm in width, 2.5 cm in depth, and 172.50 sq. cm in area, indicating that the earlier measurements did not reflect the actual wound size and depth. In interviews, the treatment nurse acknowledged that on the date of the initial photo for this resident, she did not manually measure the wound and instead accepted the device’s automatic readings, including a depth of 0 cm. She further stated that actual wound measurements were not obtained until the surgical consult several days later and that she relied on serial photos taken upon admission or the following day and then weekly to assess wound progress. The DON later confirmed that the treatment nurse documented this resident’s wound measurements incorrectly and did not manually verify or correct the automatically generated measurements. A second resident was admitted with diagnoses including acute kidney failure and a disorder of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and was identified on the MDS as having one or more unhealed PU/Is and being at risk for pressure ulcers. A progress note documented a sacral PU/I present on admission with measurements of 1.14 cm in length, 0.57 cm in width, 0 cm in depth, and 0.43 sq. cm in area, again based on a photo taken by the treatment nurse. A later surgical consult described a coccyx wound extending to the right and left buttock, staged as a stage II PU/I, with measurements of 7.0 cm in length, 3.0 cm in width, 0.1 cm in depth, and 21 sq. cm in area. The treatment nurse stated that the admitting nurse had only marked skin sites without measurements on arrival, and that she took photos and obtained measurements the following day using the device’s automatic readings, without manual measurement, despite knowing that the device’s measurements were sometimes inaccurate. The DON confirmed that the treatment nurse did not manually measure these PU/I sizes to correct the automatically generated measurements, contrary to facility policies requiring complete and accurate documentation of skin condition, including size and location of affected areas.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙