Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Protect a Cognitively Impaired Resident From Verbal Abuse by a Visitor

Tucson, Arizona Survey Completed on 12-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse by a visitor. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including encounter for palliative care, pneumonia, and UTI, and had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a Quarterly MDS; a BIMS could not be completed, and no behavioral symptoms were documented. On one occasion, a CNA documented that the resident bit a caregiver’s right second finger during care. Later that same day, another progress note documented that a CNA reported the caregiver had put soap in the resident’s mouth because the resident was cursing, and that this was the reason the resident bit the caregiver. The house supervisor was notified of the incident. In interviews, a CNA stated that although veterans may swear frequently, staff and others cannot retaliate, and confirmed that putting soap in a resident’s mouth would constitute abuse. The caregiver, interviewed by phone, stated she had been hired by the resident’s wife as a companion caregiver to assist with cleaning and feeding, recalled a disagreement with the family, and reported having short-term memory loss and not remembering many details. The DON reported that the caregiver told the resident to be nice and stop using vulgar words and warned that people who curse get their mouths washed out with soap; the caregiver had soap on her hands when the resident lunged forward and bit the soap and her fingers. The Administrator, who served as the abuse coordinator, stated that a friend of the family had threatened to wash the resident’s mouth out with soap and confirmed that the resident bit the visitor. Both the DON and Administrator stated that it was not acceptable for visitors to threaten to put soap in residents’ mouths, and the facility’s abuse prevention policy stated that residents have the right to be free from abuse, including verbal and physical abuse.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙