F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
D

Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan Within 48 Hours of Admission for High Fall-Risk Resident

Sandstone Of Tucson Rehab CentreTucson, Arizona Survey Completed on 01-28-2026

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for a newly readmitted resident, as required by 42 CFR §483.21(a)(1). The resident was readmitted with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit. An admission clinical evaluation documented that the resident arrived by wheelchair and was alert and oriented times three with some forgetfulness, and the physician’s admission history noted a recent two‑day history of weakness, falls at home, inability to ambulate, and dizziness. An admission Morse Fall Scale completed the day of admission showed a score of 65, indicating high fall risk. Despite these findings, review of the medical record revealed that no baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission to provide instructions to meet the resident’s immediate needs. A comprehensive care plan was not initiated until two days after admission. That care plan identified an ADL self‑care performance deficit related to deconditioning and risk for falls related to deconditioning and gait/balance problems, and included interventions such as encouraging participation in care, ensuring the call light and commonly used items were within reach, and anticipating and promptly responding to needs. Prior to this comprehensive care plan, there was no documented baseline care plan outlining initial goals, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, or other minimum health information necessary to guide staff in providing person‑centered care immediately after admission. The absence of a baseline care plan occurred despite the facility’s own fall prevention policy, which required timely assessment and initiation of individualized interventions for residents at risk for falls. Following admission, the resident experienced multiple falls. Nursing documentation described unsteady gait, poor balance, and the resident’s refusal to follow instructions and insistence on going to the bathroom independently, even while wearing briefs. Progress notes recorded that the resident was found on the floor on more than one occasion, with neuro checks initiated after each event and vital signs monitored. An admission MDS later showed a BIMS score of 6, indicating severely impaired cognition. In a subsequent interview, the RN stated that the unit manager is responsible for initiating the baseline care plan and confirmed that no baseline care plan was found for this resident in the electronic medical record. The DON also acknowledged that the resident’s fall care plan did not reflect the high fall risk identified in the fall assessment and that the care plan was not updated after the resident’s fall incidents. These findings collectively demonstrate that the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to address the resident’s immediate needs as required by regulation and facility policy. The facility’s fall prevention policy, adopted several months before the events, specified that each resident would be evaluated upon admission and that the IDT would review fall risk assessments and initiate fall prevention protocols as appropriate. It also stated that the DON or designee would ensure that residents identified at risk for falls or who had experienced a recent fall had all recommended interventions in place, with current assessments and documentation reflecting notification of applicable disciplines, the physician, and the resident’s family or responsible party. Despite this written process, the resident’s record lacked a timely baseline care plan and did not initially incorporate the high fall risk status into the care planning process, contributing to the cited deficiency.

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Resources

Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:

See other F0655 citations
Baseline Care Plan Missing Oxygen and Bi-Pap Needs
D
F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Short Summary

Baseline Care Plan Missing Oxygen and Bi-Pap Needs: A resident admitted with acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, COPD, and dependence on supplemental O2 did not have a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours to include O2 administration or bi-pap use. The ADON initiated the plan but did not add these needs, and an LVN caring for the resident was unaware he used bi-pap nightly.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Baseline Care Plan Missing Enteral Feeding Instructions
D
F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Short Summary

Baseline Care Plan Missing Enteral Feeding Instructions: A resident admitted with pneumonitis, stroke, and hemiplegia had an order for Isosource 1.5 via enteral feeding, but the admission observation and baseline care plan failed to identify the gastric/enteral tube and did not include instructions for gastrostomy tube or enteral feeding care. The RN consultant confirmed the baseline care plan was not developed and implemented to include the needed instructions for effective, person-centered care.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Review and Offer Baseline Care Plans Within 48 Hours
E
F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Short Summary

Failure to Review and Offer Baseline Care Plans Within 48 Hours: The facility did not document that baseline care plans were reviewed with the resident or representative and a copy offered within 48 hours for three newly admitted residents. The DON stated one resident’s care plan copy was not available, and the lead social services coordinator said baseline care plans were typically reviewed at the admission care conference, usually 7 to 14 days after admission, and she did not know the 48-hour requirement.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Missing Baseline Care Plan for Substance Use Disorder
D
F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Short Summary

A resident admitted after being found unresponsive had diagnoses including psychoactive substance abuse, major depression, and quadriplegia, with hospital testing positive for cocaine and fentanyl. The admission assessment noted intact cognition and regular drug use, but the record had no baseline care plan for substance use prevention, monitoring, or treatment interventions, and an MDS LPN confirmed no related plan of care was present.

Inspection fine: $29,045
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Provide Baseline Care Plan Summary
D
F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Short Summary

A facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to two residents and/or their representatives within the required timeframe. One resident had diagnoses including a lumbar fracture, morbid obesity, and cirrhosis of the liver, while the other had UTI, DM, and ataxic gait. The NHA confirmed there was no evidence the required baseline care plan summary was provided.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Baseline Care Plan Not Completed Within Required Timeframe
D
F0655 F655: Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Short Summary

Baseline Care Plan Not Completed Within Required Timeframe: A resident with severe dementia, a BIMS score of 0, and needs for partial to moderate ADL assistance did not have a baseline care plan in the EHR within the required timeframe after admission. Staff interviews showed the MDS nurse, ADON, and DON had differing descriptions of who completed the plan and when, and the record review showed no care plan present initially and only a later-restored entry with a single FULL CODE focus.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation search

Search every citation & Plan of Correction

Go to search
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across Arizona

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in Arizona — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

Trusted data from CMS and state health departments

Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.

In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.

The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.

Get the Survey-Prep Report
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Connection lost — reconnecting… We couldn't reconnect automatically. Please reload the page to continue.