Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Infection Control Protocol During Perineal Care

Rio Grande City, Texas Survey Completed on 12-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to follow proper infection prevention and control procedures during perineal care for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and incontinence. The CNA performed hand hygiene and donned clean gloves before care, but then touched multiple surfaces in the resident's environment, including the call light remote, blankets, and sheets, without removing her gloves or performing hand hygiene again before starting incontinent care. This sequence of actions did not align with infection control best practices, as the gloves became potentially contaminated after contact with the resident's surroundings. The resident involved was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living and was at risk for skin breakdown and urinary tract infections due to incontinence. The CNA acknowledged during an interview that she should have removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene after touching the resident's environment and before providing direct care. The facility's Director of Nursing confirmed that the expected procedure, in line with CDC guidelines, was not followed. Facility records showed that the CNA had recently completed training on infection prevention and hand hygiene, and that the facility's infection control policy did not specifically detail hand hygiene requirements during incontinent care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙