Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
G

Failure to Provide Timely Wound Care and Skin Assessments

Johnson City, Texas Survey Completed on 12-03-2025

Penalty

Fine: $19,135
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices. Specifically, the resident was admitted with a superficial abrasion on the right heel, but there were no physician orders in place to treat or monitor the heel abrasion from the time of admission through several weeks. Despite an order for a wound consult and a pressure-relieving mattress, there was no documentation of wound care being performed, and no wound consult notes were found in the resident's chart. The care plan identified a risk for impaired skin integrity, but interventions were not implemented or documented as required. Weekly skin assessments were not completed as scheduled, with missed assessments on two specific dates. Nursing staff interviews revealed confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibility for skin assessments and reporting of skin changes. One RN was unable to access the electronic charting system and did not complete or document all required skin assessments, nor did she escalate the issue to facility management or corporate staff. Other staff members observed changes in the resident's heel, such as blistering and discoloration, and reported these to nurses, but there was no evidence that these reports led to timely physician notification or initiation of treatment orders. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that changes in the resident's skin condition were not consistently reported to the appropriate clinical leadership, such as the DON, ADM, or physician. The facility lacked a DON at the time, and staff were unclear about the reporting chain. Observations of the resident's heel showed progression from an abrasion to areas suggestive of pressure injury and possible necrosis, yet no wound care or monitoring was documented. Facility policy required full assessment and documentation of pressure ulcers and prompt physician notification, but these standards were not met in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙